I must be the only one who liked the ref cam. It showed you exactly what was being said to the players and what they where saying back!

The spider cam on the other hand, annoyed me watching in the stadium and did nothing when watched back to tv :/

In that instance, I'm sure they now realise some of the angles don't work and there's only so much you can do with something of that nature. In order to know that however, you've actually got to get out there and use it and that's what I'm applauding.

They tried some innovative techniques, they nailed it when it comes to showing how expansive the play can be for example, but some other ideas will probably be scrapped for the future. I still think they did a good job - I'm a massive geek when it comes to camera technology and I love Rugby League, so personally it struck a chord.

I'm waiting for Sky to introduce the 'Moron Mike'.
Y'know, the studio microphone that automatically turns itself off when tweedledumb and tweedledumber spout their usual gob-excrement

With tweaking the spider cam could be good. Like someone said it needs to be used to gain experience and utilise it properly. The Ref cam I like the idea but thought they never used properly. In that it shown the players gobbing off to refs where it could show things from play from a refs POV. Some tries could be a brilliant from the ref cam and spider cam if shown in replays.

I liked Cummins on it gave an insite into refs and one instance springs to mind when Bailey knocked on with SOL underneath him, I was expecting a penalty to Leeds and if Cummins hadn't explained why it wasn't I'd have been baffled.

I would like to congratulate the Sky team bar from Eddie and Stevo for a profesional job they carried out. For those two cretins for the two days Bill Arthur and Co where stating that the refs had let a bit go to keep the action flowing. Then these two came on and started going on about the Ganson incident every two seconds (or it felt like) then calling for penalties left right and which wouldn't have been in any of the other games. It's about time these two left.

They are just embarrassing at times. In their opinion calling refereeing mistakes or telling us how furious the coaches are, doesn't put our sport in a good light for regular viewers, and especially so for new fans who will be wanting a more professional presentation giving them a quality viewing experience to bring them back to the game.
If regular viewers think they are poor, then what will newbies think?