FORUMS > Wigan Warriors > Hock signs for Widnes - confirmed |
![](images/sitelogos/2022-28.jpg) |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 883 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2017 | Nov 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
15587.jpg :15587.jpg |
|
| Quote: Cruncher "Well there, Vectra, you are letting your prejudice show.
We know there are two sides to every story. So far, you've done pretty well representing Gareth's side of the tale, but there are numerous people I know who will take very great issue with these particular assumptions.
It's okay to support Hock if he's a friend or whatever, but remember ... many, many times in the past he has been the architect of his own misfortunes. I'll say it one more time, don't believe everything you are told.'"
I'm not showing any predjudice whatsoever and I couldn't agree more about Hock being the architect of his own problems. I don't know Hock at all personally, other than the odd passing out and about. I'm just saying that as a player he still has a value worth and as a player and its his right to expect to be paid to this, granted he was on a contract. I believe (not getting into how) he was on a gradually increasing contract reduced from what he used to be on as a result of his ban, as was released by the club it was voulantarily increased (as part of his contract) and he felt that he was worth more so presumably asked for it? is this so wrong given that he could probably have got more elsewhere (as many other players have done so before him without getting slammed on these boards) and would have been had his protracted move to Parra not fallen through.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 32319 | ![](images/sitelogos/fullsize/28.png) |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Jun 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
3076_1671446335.jpg SAINTS THE ORIGINAL AND PERENNIAL CHEATS
For sale full Saints kit (circa 1989). Shirts in pristine condition, but shorts badly soiled.
For 27 - 0 you get a trophy
For 75 - 0 you get sod all.
Wigan had eight in a row
Saints have five in a row:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_3076.jpg |
|
| Quote: Vectrabeast "If that is how you want to decipher it then thats up to you. I have been led to believe that Hock hasn't spoken directly to IL, that all conversation has been through his agent and also that contrary to any statement from the club Hock hasn't missed training or rehabilitation. I'm not claiming that everything I have been told is gospel, just that I believe most of it to be true, there are bound to be differences of opinion when information is coming from various sources but what I would class as the important information is pretty credible to me.
I'm not spreading rumours about the club or any individuals I'm merely giving my opinion based on information I have. (information that I have kept entirely to myself)'"
Did Lenagan state in that press release that he had spoke "face to face" with Hock?
That's not interpretation, that is published in black and white.
Wigan chairman Ian Lenagan stood by Hock during his drugs ban, but added: "Gareth Hock has made it clear in face-to-face discussions with me and via his agent that he has no intention of playing for the Wigan club.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 883 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2017 | Nov 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
15587.jpg :15587.jpg |
|
| Quote: Rogues Gallery "Did Lenagan state in that press release that he had spoke "face to face" with Hock?
That's not interpretation, that is published in black and white.
Wigan chairman Ian Lenagan stood by Hock during his drugs ban, but added
I'm not disputing what IL said, its there for all to see
"I'm not claiming that everything I have been told is gospel, just that I believe most of it to be true, there are bound to be differences of opinion when information is coming from various sources but what I would class as the important information is pretty credible to me."
Answer your question?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 3416 | ![](images/sitelogos/fullsize/28.png) |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Jun 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
123.jpg No trees were harmed during the creation of this post.
However, a number of electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
.
Saint94 wrote "Every team is in your feckin shadow....we all know." - Amen to that, brother
.
Saddened! wrote "We've got the worst backline in the competition, bar possibly London and Wakey. I'd swap our 1-7 with Salford in a heartbeat.":123.jpg |
|
| Is it not time this was locked, as it's just going round in ever decreasing circles now?
Quote: Circular Reference "
10 "I have the truth, but can't/shan't/won't tell anyone else"
20 "I don't believe you, unless you reveal everything you know, your sources and underwear size"
30 GOTO 10
'"
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 32319 | ![](images/sitelogos/fullsize/28.png) |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Jun 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
3076_1671446335.jpg SAINTS THE ORIGINAL AND PERENNIAL CHEATS
For sale full Saints kit (circa 1989). Shirts in pristine condition, but shorts badly soiled.
For 27 - 0 you get a trophy
For 75 - 0 you get sod all.
Wigan had eight in a row
Saints have five in a row:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_3076.jpg |
|
| Quote: Vectrabeast "I'm not disputing what IL said, its there for all to see
Answer your question?'"
No what your saying is that you believe IL isn't telling the truth, aren't you?
Quote: Vectrabeast " My understanding is slightly different though, that Hock hadn't spoken directly to IL that all discussions had been done through Hock's agent.'"
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 14321 | ![](images/sitelogos/fullsize/28.png) |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Apr 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
27_1469093054.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_27.jpg |
Moderator
|
| I think Pie Eyed summed it up perfectly, we're going round in circles with rumour and innuendo that potentially could get some people into a lot of trouble. The main subject matter about Hock himself hasn't really been discussed for some time now, so it's probably best if we leave this thread alone for now.
Representation has been made to the site about some of the subject matter in this thread and "[ipeople from within the club are aware of the false comments....... and if it persists then they will persue the matter further.[/i"
I would suggest people don't repeat any of the rumours or even imply what they are, even by PM. Closing this thread doesn't mean people can start the same conversations on the Wane thread, thanks.
|
|
|
![](images/sitelogos/2022-28.jpg) |
|
![](images/sitelogos/2022-28.jpg) |