If Sam called the ball when there was no move on then it his him that is at fault not Fielden for giving it, he doesn't know what Sam has seen, he responds to Sams knowledge and experience, which if your scenario is correct isn't enouogh for this type of game. Maybe therefore Tomkins shouldn't have been on the field.

Now it becomes clear what you are up to. Nice try.

I don't think anybody is upto anything AJ, other than trying to suggest it's not always black and white and cut and dried

Correct, this is no trolling, my Wigan credentials are as good as anyones.

Its easy to blast a player, however if you don't know the full story you could be way off the mark.

So what is the full story oh wise one? Other than some late night trolling re Sam?

There isn't a 'full story', Sam could have been Tommy, Pat or Piggy it just happened you used an example where Sam the most inexperienced player ws involved.

Supporters get too wound up on individuals, its a team game and sometimes the team as a whole under performs, sometimes individuals do under perform but when that happens if the team plays well they can carry him. However one thing you are never sure of standing (sitting these days) on the terraces is what the players are told to do and trying to do and who calls what,