Questions reference Cowgirl Nostalgist

1) Has too much time on his/her time ?
2) Is rapidly becoming more tedious than Gutterfax in all his guises ?
3) Believes his/her own hype and thinks every thread needs his/her dry pointless smart remarks ?
4) Is a freeloading prick who has no genuine interest in London Broncos ?
5) Even if he/she had the money of David Hughes would be clueless how spend it to enhance the development of London Broncos ?
6) Needs to move on and haunt the Skolars forum where he will be more welcome

Well said.

Yes to questions 1-5.

No to 6...don't inflict this obnoxious old prick on my other London team (send the fecker to Bradford or Wigan where he'll barely be noticed)

Here's a thought if you don't like me instead of crying to the mods, threatening me with libel & generally badmouthing me stick me on ignore.

Job done.

Agree with the list,

Do you also agree with chasing me off this board?

Which is what these bullying tactics are all about.

Oh diddums, didn't realise you were such a sensitive soul. Ignore you, no, why, you have an opinion - the trouble is I don't know what that opinion is and I am just waiting to see you post something of consequence or value, anything that matters.

You appear only able to decry the London Broncos at every opportunity, belittle every effort they make with smart d toss. I guess Mintball has moved you off your other pet subject David Hughes.

As for bullying, I was merely asking some open ended questions, if you dont like the answers .......

When the club warrant anything other than mockery I'll pipe up.

Till then it's open season.

PS

Technically my criticism of Mr Hughes quixotic ownership is ring fenced not sidelined entirely.

Whereas criticism of my inability to fund the club to similar car crash proportions is literally all over the shop.

Did anyone read the playing nicely thread?

Obviously not.

& before anyone takes my name in vain please point out where I have repeatedly sworn at anyone.

Feel free to use the ignore button

But if I did that I'd miss you spectacularly missing the point on a regular basis.

This being one of those occasions.

But to spell it out for you I've haven't breached the AUP.

Whereas the bloke who accused me of libel & others have.

So you say. I can't be bothered checking through your deluge of "contributions" to this forum to find out. I'll just say that I find little value in any of them.

Fair enough.

The stench of rank hypocrisy on this forum is particularly pungent though.