Following a 52 point victory with a forty point defeat, I mean.

Has this 92 point turnaround be bettered in the Super League era or in the history of pro RL? Any RL historians out there?

Not strictly SL, but didn'y our accademy leak 90 points v Wigan last year and then beat the same team 6 days later.
Also believe Big Mac has been talking to Eric Cantona.....

From the BBC
Harlequins coach Brian McDermott:
"Some days are diamonds, some days are stones. This result was a huge stone.
"Policemen sometimes make wrong arrests and we had 17 players who all had an off day at the same time."

Stone - it was bl00dy great boulder of a day

.

The galpharm's becoming a massive bogey ground for us isn't it?

2004- 25-22
2005..34-24
2006 64-14


2007 46-16
2008 26-16
2009 46-6
Since I have been watching the game, we have 1 win (2003) up there.....


Just seems to be a ground we don't like.

What the hell does that mean!!

Brian was right with his stone analogy.

Watching that game was as painful as trying to pass a huge kidney stone!

Thanks Paddock for arranging the magic bus (and to wire quin for co-piloting).

High-light of the day was Kate's wonderful cake! Yum...

'we were rubbish'

Having been in 2007 and yesterday, I can confirm it's a ground I don't like.

It's a record for me, first game since the first Fulham V Wigan match, I gave up before the end, it was enough for me!!

Games like this and even the Warrington match give such basis that the franchise system does not work if teams give in as if it does not matter

Now we see how we can pick ourselves up and bounce back this next weekend.

Wasn't there a draw in their somewhere?
I remember going up and watching us give them their first point in a season where they'd lost 10 or 11 in a row from the start.

Equalled by the Bulls.

... and bettered by Salford.

24th June 2001
Attendance: 2,235


They have really turned their crowds around


22-22.......

I think:
On the basis of the evidence presented today you would be right to think we are a bad team (guilty as charged...). But last weekend we showed some evidence to prove we are not a bad team and next weekend we'll show you some more.

That's was the most sensible way I could think to interpret it. It doesn't sound to me like the whole statement wasn't reported. I'm sure it made sense in the context it was delivered.