|
| |
LOADING TOPIC PLEASE WAIT...
|
|
 |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 191 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2005 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2014 | May 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Don't worry about miracles, a CEO "that can work" would be a start !
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 20966 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2015 | Feb 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I do feel for Gus. Appointed to a role he was patently not qualified to carryout, he has stumbled from farce to fiasco citing stupid reasoning for his major decisions.
Exhibit A. The choice of Shirt was based...and I quote him directly...as "something I could see myself wearing down the pub" .....so we got a black or light blue T-shirt.
Exhibit B. "The name Harlequins Rugby League was causing confusion as to what game we played"....sorry gus, but the second and third words of our name wereprettyself explanitory.
There many others, such as getting his mates company to manufacturer replica kit of questionable quality.......failing for 47 games to find a shirt sponsor, trying to charge ST holders 40 quid for a 2 course meal whilst offering it to away fans with a premium ticket and a programme, Hiring a PR person as his marketing manager from a contanct at Cricket, telling me directly that "she knows her stuff" then firing her 3 months later....only for her to be appointed to a role she is qualified to do by our landlords. The list goes on.....
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1512 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2012 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2016 | Feb 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Wasn't the point of the Harlequins RL moniker that it was a prelude to full merger with Harlequins RU?
Once that was off the table there wasn't much point in continuing with it.
I'd agree that the rebrand has been a total disaster though.
| | |
 | |
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2025 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
2025-08-30 10:02:57 LOAD:2.580078125
|
|
|
POSTS | ONLINE | REGISTRATIONS | RECORD |
---|
19.67M | 1,551 | 80,283 | 14,103 |
|
|
|