Anywhere in LONDON not kent

Millwall is pretty compact for a ground that holds 20 odd thousand.

Moot point though as the Old Bill would never let anyone groundshare with them.

What's it got to do with the police? None of their business whatsoever.

And I reckon they'd do a decent deal on rental tbh. But IIRC Hughes or McKay made a comment once about the reputation Millwall have not being right for us. But a scag-filled town like Gillingham's better!

Swinton has a better class of Local and is a far nicer area........as is Harare

The future of the club has to be ground ownership. All rented venues are just temporary stop overs, so I would go anywhere that it is a reasonable commute, Gillingham included.

Should be concentrating on the Merton and White Hart Lane possibilities. The New River Stadium has only 1,000 seats but is rated as over 5,000 capacity, one of the 6,000+ seat 'temporary' stands at the Olympics being taken down in a few of weeks could be reassembled across the running track and terracing on the other side from the existing seating and you could have a 7,000+ seating 3,000+ standing arena superior to a lot of grounds in Super League at the moment for a few £100,000. I can't say how much the councils concerned would want to turn a net cost piece of land into a rate paying proposition with more sport being played in the borough, but I hope not very much.

If our team costs went up this year from a guessed £1.2 million to £1.6 million this year I know where I would have rather spent the money.

P.S.
Thank you David Hughes please spend as much as money on the Broncos as you like, in any way you would like to do it.

I agree entirely. I would be prepared to swallow a move to Kent only on the basis that it is a stop-gap move until we move back in a year, when a new partner will have let us share their stadium. Anything else is a jump off a cliff (and that always ends badly)

[sizeKEEP LONDON IN LONDON[/size