2 errors, 1 missed tackle, 2 carries 7 metres according to the Superleague website. Not having a go as I know many will spring in to defend ours however when you compare those stats to Brett Hodgsons this weekend 2 missed tackles, 1 error so about the same, but 18 carries, 108 yards, 7 tackle busts, 2 runs from dummy half, 3 attacking kicks.

All full backs miss tackles and make a few mistakes but the work rate is a concern for me !!! No doubt I am being unreasonable I don't think so just an interesting observation !!

Yawn.

You clearly are having a go !

Ditto.

Oooh can I play.

Grix has over the course of the season:

Scored more tries
Made more marker tackles
Made more tackles (nearly twice as many) but only missed two more
Bust more tackles
Kicked more
Carried the ball less and made fewer metres but gained more metres per carry
Made more clean breaks

Brett Hodgson has:

Made fewer errors
More dummy runs

However all that is meaningless because Scott Grix is our full back. Live with it.

Oh and I bet Brett Hodgson doesn't have fans getting on his back everytime he steps on the field.

not since he left the giants..........

think its fair to say that Grix is definitely one player who you're either happy to have him in the team or not, same with all players some fans like them some dont !.

Putting stats up etc in either argument wont make a blind bit of difference, people have their own opinions of him and nothing will change that

well said daz

without doubt its an area as a team we can improve on

only have to look at other teams full backs to see that.

high error rate by grix (more than eden and who would of thought that )

if grix was free to go dont think any super league team would sign him up for there full back spot, prob end up in the championship at fev or fax

would love to see gaskell play full back for us or even murphy next season with broughton on the wing.

I disagree, I think plenty of Superleague clubs would take Grix at fullback

As I said, We could sign Billy Slater and he'd be getting grief from some of our fans.

Keep on seeing stuff about sign Gaskell and play him fullback, why would we as far as I know he's a standoff just playing fullback at Salford cause he cant get in the halfback roles. I'm happy with Grix yeah he might cost us a game but there's plenty off games he saved for us if not give Murphy a chance there with the signing off Bailey as a ball playing loose maybe we'll have less emphasis on a creative full back and he's safe as houses. There's also Connor I think hes called out of the 19's looks a good prospect can play there.

IMO we don't need to change our fullback, grix has been good for this season, yes hes made a couple of errors but doesn't everyone.

His organisation of our defensive line is superb, and for that alone he's worth his place

There was much chat about this topic at last night's HGSA meeting. The general, no, the unanimous opinion was that at worst Grix is good. People were pointing out his various good points, but also admitted that sometimes he made mistakes.

There were two things which really annoyed most people who sit near every member of the society.

The unanimous consensus was that we have the best team in 60 years. We should be backing the team to the hilt, not trying to cause a player to lose his confidence.

It just seems, as in all walks of life [just ask Ken and the Town 'supporters'], the antis have a louder, nastier voice than the majority.

So, for every HGSA member there are 2-3 people with a differing opinion than them and that makes them a nasty minority??

Regardless of what people's opinions of Grix are, that is a pretty needless statement and will not encourage people to join HGSA