If everything you are saying is true then surely It cannot be thewlis that’s the problem........

Who runs the club? Thewlis
Who employs him ? Ken
Who’s fault is it ultimately? Ken
Who is allowing club to slip into mediocrity? Ken
Who makes all the decisions that effect day to day running? Thewlis

Get your head out of thewlis backside and see what’s in front of you

Credit to Thorman for his honesty and giving the young ones a chance - we wouldnt have got to see English and the Seniors if Stone was here. However, if he is going to keep accommodating Gaskell then id rather him not get the job. Gaskell is absolutely dreadful.

cant give thorman a job because hes honest.

just like we couldnt keep rick stone in a job because hes a great guy.

results business and record of DLLL is not going to get you the job,.or maybe it will at the giants ! two further LL's on the way too....

yes injury crisis... but rick stone has the same too.

today was thormans make or break game and we failed.

Sorry wrong time for Thorman unless it’s with an experienced Director of Rugby

SPOT on for me. We need someone who wont just pick players because they are on a big wage like Gaskell. He offers absolutely nothing for this team but yet will get picked no matter what.

Wants in front of me is you saying thewlis is a liability, and there needs to be a change at the top- but the man with the power to sack him saying his job isn’t
I’m question so by that logic, if you are right, you are saying our chairman is the problem?

Yes, he’s too loyal to someone who isn’t doing his job and that is and has cost us dearly over the years

Can you in all honesty say the club is run well? Can you say recruitment is good ? And please don’t keep peddling the coaches sign the players line as it’s not true, don’t tell me chris brought in bumper either because he didn’t and had no say in it

Thewlis thinks the players aren’t fit so brought bumper in, even if super fit a lot of those players not good enough

If ken leaves club is doomed, if ken leaves thewlis in charge it will be a longer more painful death

SPOT ON.

Who else is there? Who would you play instead?

I’d play olly Russell and Sam Hewitt ahead of Gaskell and Turner, turner overweight and add nothing while Gaskell is embarrassing, why play them? What have they brought or bring ? But neither is going anywhere soon ditto Rankin and one more year of brough

Glad your not the coach.
Olly Russell isn’t the standard we need- otherwise Wigan would have kept hold of him!!!! Hewitt did ok for a debut in terms of enthusiasm yes- but made plenty of errors and missed 6 tackles. It’s all very well playing youngsters- but if you play a whole team
Of them you are going to get beaten.

This from the person who wants Tyllar Mellor and Isacc Farrell in the team, Turner gives nothing, Gaskell gives nothing, and Wigan are have international halves in abundance but hey he’s not from Newsome so bag him and Sam

To be fair , as a team they are all dreadful.

To be fair jools if you play at Huddersfield it's a fair chance you are going to get beaten whoever you play, which is not the end of the world if you are giving an account of yourselves, but when you cant pass very well, cant catch very well, are very good at knocking on and giving penalties, It is no wonder we are down to 4.000 odd.

We need someone who can instill discipline, that's been our number one downfall for the last 3 years.

Number 2 downfall is errors, i can forgive errors, but discipline is a choice, and the majority of our players choose not to have any

I thought that was a daft comment in an otherwise good interview from her.

some want that

brian carney says he has heard a whisper the club are looking at an aussie whos not a head coach in the nrl... says fans will be underwhelmed..

jason demetriou?

I don't care if he has been coaching a team of kids in the outback, If he is tough enough to stand no nonsense and can motivate them , he's what we need.

I want to see some one who can be the boss, rather than telling you how hard he's been on them in the examiner.

Andrew Henderson would fit that description too, did good things at London