Not at all. Players can decide to leave clubs and seek a new contract elsewhere. Their agent will tell the club that this is the case. In that scenario it is in the clubs best interests to let the player sort out his future. Most player re-negotiations will take place, on a prelimenary level, before the start of their final year of contract. Clubs need to know who will be staying and who going when planning for the following years salary cap. Especially as having to buy out a players contract would reduce their cap spend for the remainder of time left on the contract.

It would be remarkably naive to assume that most players have not got their future at least planned at this stage of the season. The only players who the anti-tampering deadline would apply to is players who the club hopes to keep but fears may have their heads turned by a big offer from another club.

Which then is an agreement with our club to make an approach for him then. I said could be one of three and you post suggest's some sort of agreement. Most players signed for different clubs are being announced now so why is this not being announced. Is it because the only agreement was for if we didn't stay in superleague?

I would imagine seeing as wakey thought there was a good chance thy wouldn't be in SL next year that they allowed players to look elsewhere. As for not announcing it this could be to keep pressure off the player so fans aren't on their back etc.

Simpson could be a surprise package ( to us all ) with a full preseason under him.
He definitely has potential.
Anyone know how far off he is with his injury now?

think Simpson should be available for the 2nd week of play-offs, think i got that correct !!

might go straight back in too if wardle is not back by then