I would like to see the specifics before i would agree with that.

Ablett takes a player out right in the mush, tansey a spear tackle both of which were in my mind a lot more serious than Masons yet one gets the same ban and the other less.

Bailey who i felt with his raised Knee which was as bad and more dangerous than masons stamp gets gets nothing.

It is the lack of consistency that concerns me

There is no justification. Someone should have brought that to the RFL's attention, unless they didn't think it was intentional. Do you have a video rather than a single selected frame because:

a) That's not good enough evidence according to Danril

b) I can't tell if there's any intent from a still image

If that was intentional then it deserved to be punished.

But in all seriousness, what did you expect me to say? Where's the evidence that O'Loughlin went high? Not got any? No, didn't think so.

I base my posts on facts. You?

I'm here on the Huddersfield forum. I am a Huddersfield fan so that's not really surprising. You're here, a Wigan fan, parping about being unbiased and then posting total biased guff. When you manage to grasp that snippet and see that you currently are making yourself look like you're a couple of saucers short of a tea set you may then subsequently see that this also goes some way to explaining why I'm here laughing at you!

Time to move on now