Fandom

Attendance score (out of 2.5)
2.5 points (average attendance over 7,500)
Leeds Rhinos, Wigan Warriors, St Helens, Hull FC, Warrington Wolves, Catalans Dragons, Hull KR, Castleford Tigers
2 points (average attendance between 7,500-3,001)
Huddersfield Giants, Toulouse Olympique, Wakefield Trinity, Salford Red Devils, Leigh Leopards, Bradford Bulls, Featherstone Rovers

On-field performance scores based on the last three seasons.
St Helens 4.75
Wigan Warriors 4.1389
Leeds Rhinos 3.7778
Catalans Dragons 3.6667
Huddersfield Giants 3.5556
Hull FC 3.4444
Warrington Wolves3.3333
Castleford Tigers 3.2222
Hull KR 3.1111
Salford Red Devils 3
Leigh Leopards 2.916
Wakefield Trinity 2.8889
Toulouse Olympique 2.7778
Featherstone Rovers 2.6556

Catchment Area
330,000 divided by 2 (Wigan and Leigh) 165,000

How can our onfield performance be above any SL team who have never been bottom. And so close to Salford who have made play offs and all sorts

It's a load of cr4p when SL places are decided on a bl00dy spreadsheet. Absolute cr4p. But the self-interested turkeys voted for it. With what I've seen, or haven't seen, of IMG they will ruin the game.

I am not that happy with how attendance points work. How can a team in the championship, or a team just come up ever score fairly against a team who has been in super league for years. I would give extra points for teams that have a good away following on a regular basis. For me that shows the true following of a team and what they bring to the game.