Yes, aware that this is somewhat jumping the gun, but thought that it might be an interesting topic for discussion.

Fev have loaned Dane Chisholm to Broncos for two weeks, a period that expires just after the latters' visit to LSV.

This mined from The Bulls' forum

Don't think, with the greatest of respect to both DC and LB, we need worry too much about this loan, but would be interested to learn who (from Fev) posters wouldn't want to meet every other week.

Bongser also asks, if this is to be taken as a genuine tactic, are Rovers fretting?

Interesting but still can’t see London causing us any issues

Personally it wouldn’t surprise me if Dane has played his last game at Fev. He doesn’t appear to fit in with Big MaCs structured game plan and given the fact that we have Jacks/Smith/Holmes/Gill/Wildie/Jones as well as Dane for 2 half back spots plus hooker and maybe one bench spot something has to give since 7 into 4 doesn’t fit. FWIW Holmes is just back from a loan deal at Sheffield without playing Leigh.

Come to Leigh Dane Chisholm. Not sure Fev would want to sell to Leigh.

No really much chance of London causing us a isssue

Dane Chisholm surplus to requirements at Fev now they have signed Jonathan Ford.

They won’t let us sign him even i we wanted to

Wouldn't want Chisholm anyway. No better than what we have already got and there's likely better in Oz.
Surprised we were not able to sign Ford. Maybe there are other irons in the fire!

My thoughts too.

Not sure I wanted Ford either. He is a liability in defence and does not like being tackled. Just get Ioanne or Amone to charge at him and a huge gap will appear.

Seriously Reynolds better than Chisholm. Dane has moved the troops round the park well every time I have seen him, which is a damn sight more than "1 good game in 10" Reynolds.

You answered the question in your previous post. We also have Ata Hingano who is a tidy all round player.

And I think that Reynolds will offer more over the season than Chisholm and although currently injured Reynolds is not as injury prone as Chisholm.

When was the last time Chisholm missed a game, or a series of games, due to injury?

I wonder if Lam could be back on the menu?