| |
| FORUMS > Leigh Leopards > This week's Disciplinary |
 |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Captain | 758 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Sep 2015 | 9 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| May 2018 | May 2018 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: Cokey "No Alan,it's just dirty Leigh they're interested in. ![]()
The Welsh team should be cited for NOT tackling in the game against York
| | |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Board Member | 11989 |  |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| May 2020 | Mar 2020 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
: |
|
|
In this week's almost identical episode of the disciplinary saga, three more players were cited for 'iffy' tackles in last weekend's games.
Last week's 'naughty' clubs, Leigh and Sheffield, appear once again, along with Toronto. Our 'miscreant', Drew Hutchison, was reviewed for 'preventing a player to regain his feet, to play the ball' - now there's an offence we rarely see!! (especially in the Barrow game, the previous week!) Hutchison was sin-binned for the 'offence', a punishment that was decreed to be sufficient.
www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/disciplinary
I have no argument with Drew's punishment, and can only marvel that, once again, 201 other players did not commit an offence worthy of being reviewed by the disciplinary process!  |
|
In this week's almost identical episode of the disciplinary saga, three more players were cited for 'iffy' tackles in last weekend's games.
Last week's 'naughty' clubs, Leigh and Sheffield, appear once again, along with Toronto. Our 'miscreant', Drew Hutchison, was reviewed for 'preventing a player to regain his feet, to play the ball' - now there's an offence we rarely see!! (especially in the Barrow game, the previous week!) Hutchison was sin-binned for the 'offence', a punishment that was decreed to be sufficient.
www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/disciplinary
I have no argument with Drew's punishment, and can only marvel that, once again, 201 other players did not commit an offence worthy of being reviewed by the disciplinary process! | |
|
| | |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Captain | 758 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Sep 2015 | 9 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| May 2018 | May 2018 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: Alan "In this week's almost identical episode of the disciplinary saga, three more players were cited for 'iffy' tackles in last weekend's games.
Last week's 'naughty' clubs, Leigh and Sheffield, appear once again, along with Toronto. Our 'miscreant', Drew Hutchison, was reviewed for 'preventing a player to regain his feet, to play the ball' - now there's an offence we rarely see!! (especially in the Barrow game, the previous week!) Hutchison was sin-binned for the 'offence', a punishment that was decreed to be sufficient.
Bussey no charge it was a blatant punch
| | |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Board Member | 11989 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| May 2020 | Mar 2020 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
: |
|
| As a contrast with the last two weeks, when only three Championship players have been 'referred' each week, the three Challenge cup ties involving Championship clubs, resulted in [size22[/size 'referrals' of Championship players. (along with 16 SL players) Featherstone head the list with 9 referrals; (Hull also had 9) Toronto with 7; (Warrington 3) and Leigh 6 (Salford 4).
The Catalans/Whitehaven game only had 3 referrals. Obviously, discipline is much better in France and League 1, than in the Championship! 
I'm surprised that our game contained 10 tackles, worthy of referral, when the previous two weeks' Championship fixtures only managed 6 in total! | | | |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Star | 6903 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Feb 2015 | 10 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Oct 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
73643_1666630451.jpeg
[img:v6cgff03]http://s26.postimg.org/9xie34xyh/leigh1.png[/img:v6cgff03]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_73643.jpeg |
|
| Quote: Alan "As a contrast with the last two weeks, when only three Championship players have been 'referred' each week, the three Challenge cup ties involving Championship clubs, resulted in [size22[/size 'referrals' of Championship players. (along with 16 SL players) Featherstone head the list with 9 referrals; (Hull also had 9) Toronto with 7; (Warrington 3) and Leigh 6 (Salford 4).
The Catalans/Whitehaven game only had 3 referrals. Obviously, discipline is much better in France and League 1, than in the Championship! ![]()
So what's the answer Alan?
| | |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Board Member | 11989 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| May 2020 | Mar 2020 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: atomic "So what's the answer Alan?'"
This season's system of 'penalty notices' was supposed to be fairer and more consistent but, on the face of it, doesn't seem to be so. Supporters of all clubs have had conspiracy theories, whereby the RFL is biased against their club. That obviously isn't the case, but somehow, consistency has to be developed and applied. The framework of what is acceptable, and what isn't, appears to be too loose at the moment. How you make that more rigid is difficult - but a way has to be found. | | | |
| | |
|
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
3.76953125:5
|
|
| POSTS | ONLINE | REGISTRATIONS | RECORD | | 19.65M | 1,418 ↑39 | 80,155 | 14,103 |
| LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.
When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
|
RLFANS Match Centre 
| Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1 | | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
| Wigan |
29 |
768 |
338 |
430 |
48 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
| Hull KR |
29 |
731 |
344 |
387 |
44 |
| Warrington |
29 |
769 |
351 |
418 |
42 |
| Leigh |
29 |
580 |
442 |
138 |
33 |
| Salford |
28 |
556 |
561 |
-5 |
32 |
| St.Helens |
28 |
618 |
411 |
207 |
30 |
| |
| Catalans |
27 |
475 |
427 |
48 |
30 |
| Leeds |
27 |
530 |
488 |
42 |
28 |
| Huddersfield |
27 |
468 |
658 |
-190 |
20 |
| Castleford |
27 |
425 |
735 |
-310 |
15 |
| Hull FC |
27 |
328 |
894 |
-566 |
6 |
| LondonB |
27 |
317 |
916 |
-599 |
6 |
| Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1 | | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
| Wakefield |
16 |
538 |
188 |
350 |
30 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
| Sheffield |
15 |
404 |
251 |
153 |
22 |
| Toulouse |
15 |
410 |
214 |
196 |
21 |
| Bradford |
15 |
355 |
244 |
111 |
19 |
| Widnes |
15 |
361 |
281 |
80 |
17 |
| Featherstone |
15 |
410 |
289 |
121 |
16 |
| |
| York |
16 |
366 |
305 |
61 |
14 |
| Batley |
15 |
239 |
322 |
-83 |
14 |
| Doncaster |
15 |
257 |
368 |
-111 |
13 |
| Swinton |
15 |
318 |
366 |
-48 |
12 |
| Halifax |
15 |
276 |
419 |
-143 |
10 |
| Whitehaven |
15 |
290 |
458 |
-168 |
10 |
| Barrow |
14 |
217 |
415 |
-198 |
10 |
| Dewsbury |
16 |
196 |
473 |
-277 |
2 |
| Hunslet |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
