Looks like only Lee and Moa being brought up before the beak.

Grade C offence for Tommy Lee, what is a ban for a Grade C?

2 to 3 matches, I think. Thanks a pant load Phil

Grade C is 2 -3 matches.

what happened to all these warrington players that should be up?

Bridge should have been sent off apparently..... and also morley for dangerously raising his knees in the tackle..... and waterhouse for a dangerous high shot and westwood and and and.......

I think the RFL must be having a separate session to deal with Warrington because just looking at the RFL website it appears they only looking at incidents from the Huddersfield players and only 1 of the 3,264 misdemeanors that Chris Bridge committed.

rlhttp://www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinaryrl

[listLee Gilmour (Huddersfield)

Tommy Lee (Huddersfield)

Chris Bridge (Warrington)

Kevin Brown (Huddersfield)

Kevin Brown (Huddersfield)

Lee Gilmour (Huddersfield)[/list

The RFL can't do anything about charging Bridge until the police have finished their enquiry into his actions. Unfortunately though, just like us, the police are still waiting for Rogues to provide confirmation of what's Bridge's offense was meant to be.

Bridge is getting done for being in possession of a Dangerous Side-Step!!!!

And an outrageous dummy!

Chris bridge's patience was saintly at the weekend. He is a very clever player.

Imagine if the personification of druggy spunk,gareth hock, had been elbowed repeatedly in the face. In fact, the whole team (briers) showed great maturity.

Hopefully all the hudds get a ban and I was hoping lee would have gotten more than 2 or 3 (obviously reduced on appeal), as he got away with a red in the match. It should have been 2 or 3 plus a red.

Obviously protecting bentham's idocy!

well the defence for his try was criminal.

funny how he never came back and explained that one.

Compared to last year it seems the disciplinary panel aren't getting as carried away this year. 2-3 games seems fair, maybe I would push for 4 as he wasn't sent off in the game.

Moa's 1-2 games seems fair, I'd go for 1 as on first glance there didn't look to be too much wrong. Obviously slow motion replays showed the shoulder connect with the head after the original collision was on the chest IMO. Not forgetting he was dismissed in the game.

Brown & Gilmour should receive warning letters about their technique. Brown's IMO was pre-meditated, no coincidence it was on Bridge but there's no way I could prove it. Bridge should also receive a warning letter about his conduct after the incident. Before any Giant fan moans about Westwood, that is penalty sufficient. If you want to take that further you might as well warn every player about conceding some sort of penalty.

On the whole, it seems the disciplinary panel are now FINALLY getting some common sense.

Moa was no charge

Yed. It wasn't. Have another look at the RFL Disciplinary area of the Website. It says No further action, but underneath it says 'Referred to a Hearing.' It's also on SSN. The word used is 'Reckless.'

So let me get this straight, Brown and Bridge were put on report for fighting in the 46th minute, yet both were not charged because both never threw punches at each other, just confronted each other.

That sounds like one hell of a crappy fight. And are refs now putting players on report for "confronting" each other? If that's the case, there would be at least 10 instances during every SL game. Ridiculous.