www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2010/ja ... o-12-teams

www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2010/ja ... o-12-teams

16 Teams - 24 games a season each 2 byes same as aus and run it the same way ! it's up to the clubs to be able to survive with less TV money or the SL to get a better deal IMO

I dont think the RFL have a clue what they are doing - how can you kick a team out because they haven't built a new stadium but finish 5th last year in super league

What do we want - shiny stadiums or the best game in the world as a product

Get a grip RFL

My worries are,if they reduce the clubs the season will become shorter thus less publicity as we will be out of the public eye for longer unless they go back to the format of playing some teams 3 times personally i think they should stick with the 14 just my opinion

Season won't be shorter with 12 teams. We'll still have 27 rounds, 22 home and away with an extra five tagged on at the end like we did before last year. Rugby League logic for you.

14 as long as they are the right 14. bring back relegation and promotion on the basis that only clubs with decent grounds can actually get into SL. get rid of jokes like the crusaders and ban the rfl from interfering any further in deciding who is and who isnt in SL - they made a complete mess of it in 2008.

yea as i said in my previous post old format

12 teams & bring back the Lancashire / Yorkshire cup & the Regal Trophy

The Regal Trophy and County Cups went because they weren't making any money. I say 15 teams, 28 games a season.

13, get rid of crusaders

not really bothered about how many teams there are, but playing some teams twice and others 3 times was nonsence and we shouldn't go back to it

14 teams is the right amount. The quality may not currently be there to ensure 14 competetive teams, but given time that will develop with more opportunities in the top division for young players.