www.warringtonwolves.org/newsvie ... orytype=RL According to the warrington website the Leeds winner was a fluke try. From all the reports I have read and the radio commentry it would seem this would not be the case. I wonder if Morley is going to come out mid week and announce that he has evert faith in the Warrington website and the current website team are the best people in the country to carry on giving such great information

www.warringtonwolves.org/newsvie ... orytype=RL According to the warrington website the Leeds winner was a fluke try. From all the reports I have read and the radio commentry it would seem this would not be the case. I wonder if Morley is going to come out mid week and announce that he has evert faith in the Warrington website and the current website team are the best people in the country to carry on giving such great information

It was a 'fluke' in as much as it was totally against the run of play.

If we hadn't gifted them a 12 point start I thought we were dominant for most of the game and should have put it to bed. We lost that game yesterday to silly handling errors, had we cut those out, we would have won.

Overall though I was pleased with the effort much better.....so much so I am goin to travel to Quins on Saturday...

It was a fluke because Leeds didn't look like scoring in the second half so a fluke loss of ball was the only way they would score.

strange choice of word - opportunist would have been better, if it was fluke it would have been the first time ever that MacGuire had scored that type of try, however he has been doing it now for 5 years.

We must have had 10-15 good try scoring chances and scored 3, Leeds had 4 and scored 3, as they sang yesterday - that's why they're champions

We shafted ourselves, but fair play to Leeds for keeping us out for a fair few sets.

I said about 2 minutes before it happened "Leeds can win this game in a flash". Sometimes I hate being right!

I feared after 10 minutes, two woeful tries to give away. All 3 of the tries could been prevent which was a real shame. We need Hicks at fullback.

hear hear

We have another full back apparently, some guy who got the no.1 jersey this year.....

try keepimg your trap shut....

As ridiculous as it seems, I'm often told not to say what I'm thinking in case it happens - or the opposite, when I praise someone or say "at least such and such hasn't happened yet" - at which point it all goes wrong. And I feel very guilty!

I wish Warrington could get them flukes where we defend our try line for 20 minutes without conceding and then force an error and score.

Personally, It ghouth we were very good defensively but attacked a bit of fluency in attack. We made a few breaks which we failed to finish but in the end they didn't cost us.

There were an awful lots of errors yesterday, from both side, and this somewheat detracted away from a quality game of rugby.

Like someone said earlier in the thread, we got the 12-0 lead early and from then in you pretty muich dominaated only to be held by strong defence. You guys threw a lot at us down our left yesterday and I thought Watkins was outstanding up against what was a very experienced right hand side attack.

As I said on a thread earlier in the week, you have the players but the coaches haven't been able to get the best from your players and I think that'll change under Smith- you will push on now I have no doubts.

All in all an enjoyable afternoon out and a hard fought two points for us.

Good luck for the rest of the year!

When is Reardon due back?

Who ??

Ray Reardon, former BBC2 'Pot Black' champion.

4 weeks or so I think

i know what you mean seb i said the same at saints when they went in for there 1st try......and had a horrible feeling it was going to happen again y`day..and it bloody well did