I thought Woody was excellent again last night. Made the hard yards, tackled well and made very few mistakes.

i found something funny on facebook last night by accident. A certain unamed poster thinks he must be gangsta by shortening his surname to just one letter.

a bit like Ice T or Mr T or H (from steps)

Watched him warm up before coming on and he looked fit and ready to play, honest hardworking player and one of only a few who seem to care at Wire, good stint form him as always.

Yeh lets take the postives from last nights game, their are far too many doom mongers on this board.

Positives.

1. The new numbers were great, you could see them a lot better.

Another one, who for me with ball in hand was excellent, drive the ball in all night, made good metres, looked a handful. Defensively was poor, Louis Anderson was the same.

unfortunately Louis Anderson has only half a brain....
while as you say with Ball in hand he is half decent but anything else that has to be done on a rugby field he is bleedin useless at.

I also thought Woody was decent.

Ran the ball in very hard and made good yards.

Best prop on show for the wire.

The only thing that has made me laugh since our result was reading the Saints board and some of their fans threatening to send emails to the RFL asking for Ian Smith to never referee them again because they think he robbed them last night.

They weren't complaining when he refereed Saints v Wire first game up.

Your post made me laugh too. The saints are always the winning team and they have won their fair share of matches by one point in the last seconds ..so well done to hull.
They are poor losers, but they will be, they havent much experience in the losing dept, however to email the league is hilarious

I wouldn't even go that far. Louis Anderson makes Westwood look like a disciplined rugby genius.

So true, it was shocking at how inept he is at removing himself from the play the ball.