|
 |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 15419 | Warrington Wolves |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Mr Snoodle:
Here's a question....who out of our current squad would be snapped up if they became available? That should give us a true picture of where we are.
I'd say Dufty, Ashton, King, Williams, Walker, possibly Currie, Sneyd & Holroyd, but that's about it, and I'm probably being generous.
Says it all really, mid table at best, another season over before it's barely begun.
Interesting you have added King to that list. He is out of contract this season and of course we don?t know what?s happening in the background but also not heard of any clubs showing interest in him.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 14554 | Warrington Wolves |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| sally cinnamon:Wires71:
Re Sam the press have picked up on his new prickly nature now. Being surly in the post match press conference when your team has been dirge never ends well.
It's not a good look because you can tell he's struggling to handle the pressure. I have some sympathy with coaches because in these media conferences some people ask the most banal questions. No preparation or real thought before going in, they just say whatever comes off the top of their heads and often reveal a lack of knowledge of the game. Other times a journo is trying to set up a 'gotcha' question. And when the coach is coming in off a loss and emotions are running high its easy to get exasperated. Still, there's an art in diffusing the questions and giving a politicians answer. It seems from that interview that the questioner was banging on about Danny Walker at halfback. Sam could have just said "Danny wasn't the reason we lost the game today...." then go on to give a few reasons giving praise to Leigh. If he thought the journos were talking crap he could just fill up the time by talking himself. In the end the journalists just want to get some quotes and then they're happy so a coach can take charge of the agenda. Don't get into a back and forth with them. Worst of all don't go down the road of "what do you think", it just makes the coach look like he's got rattled. You sometimes get a coach who likes to chat to the media when things are going well, then when he gets surly it's a sign that the end is looming. In football Ange Postegoglu at Spurs is a good example. Cullen was a bit grumpy sometimes but he managed to keep things under control. When he was in a bad mood, he would just sit in press conferences and give very short, clipped answers and then wait until the journos ran out of questions. He didn't give tetchy responses. Tony Smith was good at keeping it together and not looking rattled in a press conference but sometimes that can annoy fans too. They think the coach doesn't care. The best I've ever seen at handling the media in a classy way was Mike Gregory. He was on another level. No matter what the question he was generous, charming and funny. I once saw a novice camera woman at a Wigan game wander up to him after he'd had a defeat and ask him who the players were in some of the photos she'd taken so she could get the names right when she filed it. 99% of coaches would have lost their rag at that, Mike G stayed with her and went through all her pictures telling her which players were in them. At the other end you get the obnoxious types who view journalists as beneath them and delight in being sarcastic and mocking them, thinking it makes them look clever. James Lowes was like this. In football, Tim Sherwood. And in politics, Kemi Badenoch. Good post. Yeah he is rattled (unsurprisingly as his dream of NRL coaching is hanging by a thread). We saw this instability when he reacted about being asked about Vegas by Chapman on live BBC and it's continuing. It's unnecessary and comes across as petulant. I get he doesn't want to bag his players, and Walker was not the reason we lost, but the question could have been answered without drama. These are not Pulitzer prize journalists asking difficult, incisive, questions, they are local/regional rag reporters just looking for a copy line.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 14554 | Warrington Wolves |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Mr Snoodle:
Here's a question....who out of our current squad would be snapped up if they became available? That should give us a true picture of where we are.
I'd say Dufty, Ashton, King, Williams, Walker, possibly Currie, Sneyd & Holroyd, but that's about it, and I'm probably being generous.
Says it all really, mid table at best, another season over before it's barely begun.
Good question. I'd add Vaughan and Harrison to the list. But the list narrows when you ask which of those would be snapped up by a GF aspiring SL side (Wigan / Hull KR / Saints), and which would go to the also ran clubs (like us).
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 2902 | Warrington Wolves |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Well if I was in the market for a centre I?d be all over Lindop rather than King. Hoping Wrench has an injury free run and irons out his defence (big ifs) - him and Lindop would be a very dangerous pair of centres. Our current centres being no real attacking threat at present.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 14554 | Warrington Wolves |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| ratticusfinch:
Well if I was in the market for a centre I?d be all over Lindop rather than King. Hoping Wrench has an injury free run and irons out his defence (big ifs) - him and Lindop would be a very dangerous pair of centres. Our current centres being no real attacking threat at present.
Lindop is going ti be a top player, not sure about Wrench. To be fair to King he was one of the few that looked threatening against Leigh. But to have two natural, pacey centres with evasion who can tackle would be a dream come true. Tai hasn't built any attacking skills since last year so, likeable character as he is, I wouldn't extend him.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 16281 | Warrington Wolves |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Wires71:
But the list narrows when you ask which of those would be snapped up by a GF aspiring SL side (Wigan / Hull KR / Saints), and which would go to the also ran clubs (like us).
This is the killer question, it's why I drew a distinction between the TS era and the Price era in terms of saying "with the squad we had we should have won the Grand Final". In the TS era our rivals would have coveted lots of our players, you could make a case that the Wigan team who beat us in 2013 would have replaced over half their starters with ours if they had the chance. Leeds - maybe not. Their core was better than ours. But it was legitimate to say we had the team to win the Grand Final. But this was still being said in the Price era when it wasn't true. At the start of every season in the Price era I'd predict us to be about 5th and outside chance of winning the Challenge Cup and on here people would say no, who's better than us, we've got the squad to match Saints/Wigan/Cats. I never saw it. I would always think - if each member of our squad was available how many would the top teams be interested in? We saw the answer after they left, it was only Cooper and Clark. I would have added Hill to that list who IMO was good enough to play for a top team when he joined Hudds. Right now...I almost daren't ask the question...
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 14554 | Warrington Wolves |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| sally cinnamon:Wires71:
But the list narrows when you ask which of those would be snapped up by a GF aspiring SL side (Wigan / Hull KR / Saints), and which would go to the also ran clubs (like us).
This is the killer question, it's why I drew a distinction between the TS era and the Price era in terms of saying "with the squad we had we should have won the Grand Final". In the TS era our rivals would have coveted lots of our players, you could make a case that the Wigan team who beat us in 2013 would have replaced over half their starters with ours if they had the chance. Leeds - maybe not. Their core was better than ours. But it was legitimate to say we had the team to win the Grand Final. But this was still being said in the Price era when it wasn't true. At the start of every season in the Price era I'd predict us to be about 5th and outside chance of winning the Challenge Cup and on here people would say no, who's better than us, we've got the squad to match Saints/Wigan/Cats. I never saw it. I would always think - if each member of our squad was available how many would the top teams be interested in? We saw the answer after they left, it was only Cooper and Clark. I would have added Hill to that list who IMO was good enough to play for a top team when he joined Hudds. Right now...I almost daren't ask the question... Yet somehow we manage to spend full cap plus marquees on them ...
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 15419 | Warrington Wolves |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Wires71:sally cinnamon:Wires71:
But the list narrows when you ask which of those would be snapped up by a GF aspiring SL side (Wigan / Hull KR / Saints), and which would go to the also ran clubs (like us).
This is the killer question, it's why I drew a distinction between the TS era and the Price era in terms of saying "with the squad we had we should have won the Grand Final". In the TS era our rivals would have coveted lots of our players, you could make a case that the Wigan team who beat us in 2013 would have replaced over half their starters with ours if they had the chance. Leeds - maybe not. Their core was better than ours. But it was legitimate to say we had the team to win the Grand Final. But this was still being said in the Price era when it wasn't true. At the start of every season in the Price era I'd predict us to be about 5th and outside chance of winning the Challenge Cup and on here people would say no, who's better than us, we've got the squad to match Saints/Wigan/Cats. I never saw it. I would always think - if each member of our squad was available how many would the top teams be interested in? We saw the answer after they left, it was only Cooper and Clark. I would have added Hill to that list who IMO was good enough to play for a top team when he joined Hudds. Right now...I almost daren't ask the question... Yet somehow we manage to spend full cap plus marquees on them ... If I had the money I would clear the club from top to bottom. I see Wigan how professional they look same can be said for a few clubs, then I look at us and it?s like an 18-30 destination club. We occasionally turn up for a game then switch off again. I think it will be like this for years to come unless we can iradicate history/culture. Thing is we will never do that because we keep giving jobs to the boys and so the culture continues. I wish I was wrong but I don?t think I am. I thought for a while Tony Smith had it sorted but eventually they got around him.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 14554 | Warrington Wolves |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| karetaker:Wires71:sally cinnamon:Wires71:
But the list narrows when you ask which of those would be snapped up by a GF aspiring SL side (Wigan / Hull KR / Saints), and which would go to the also ran clubs (like us).
This is the killer question, it's why I drew a distinction between the TS era and the Price era in terms of saying "with the squad we had we should have won the Grand Final". In the TS era our rivals would have coveted lots of our players, you could make a case that the Wigan team who beat us in 2013 would have replaced over half their starters with ours if they had the chance. Leeds - maybe not. Their core was better than ours. But it was legitimate to say we had the team to win the Grand Final. But this was still being said in the Price era when it wasn't true. At the start of every season in the Price era I'd predict us to be about 5th and outside chance of winning the Challenge Cup and on here people would say no, who's better than us, we've got the squad to match Saints/Wigan/Cats. I never saw it. I would always think - if each member of our squad was available how many would the top teams be interested in? We saw the answer after they left, it was only Cooper and Clark. I would have added Hill to that list who IMO was good enough to play for a top team when he joined Hudds. Right now...I almost daren't ask the question... Yet somehow we manage to spend full cap plus marquees on them ... If I had the money I would clear the club from top to bottom. I see Wigan how professional they look same can be said for a few clubs, then I look at us and it?s like an 18-30 destination club. We occasionally turn up for a game then switch off again. I think it will be like this for years to come unless we can iradicate history/culture. Thing is we will never do that because we keep giving jobs to the boys and so the culture continues. I wish I was wrong but I don?t think I am. I thought for a while Tony Smith had it sorted but eventually they got around him. True. It all starts at the top. Board and CEO. If that isn't right the rest won't be either. We have a TEMU CEO and, i am led to believe, a chairman that meddles in the recruiment like a boy playing with his train set.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9931 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| just_browny:
There's no evidence whatsoever that Wane would thrive outside of Wigan. Good record yes, but he only cares about Wigan and at the first sign of trouble he would blame.the 'Wire culture' rather than do anything about changing whatever that culture is. Just like Powell, who brought in all his mates like Holmes and Matautia and blamed the 'Wire culture' rather than the fact his mates were just poor players.
To be fair to Powell, he's done well at every single club he's been at apart from Warrington. Certainly makes you think.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 15419 | Warrington Wolves |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Lord Tony Smith:just_browny:
There's no evidence whatsoever that Wane would thrive outside of Wigan. Good record yes, but he only cares about Wigan and at the first sign of trouble he would blame.the 'Wire culture' rather than do anything about changing whatever that culture is. Just like Powell, who brought in all his mates like Holmes and Matautia and blamed the 'Wire culture' rather than the fact his mates were just poor players.
To be fair to Powell, he's done well at every single club he's been at apart from Warrington. Certainly makes you think. Because the club is run by the players and not the coach ? Often heard and read comments alluding to this in the past. Now I clearly have no idea if there is any truth of this, but stories of various players over the seasons makes it believable and that?s why I often mention the culture here. It will in all likelihood have begun with a coach being way to pally with the squad and it?s gone on from there right up to today.
|
|
|
 |
|