On a more positive note, we looked pants early last season by scraping wins against poor teams. We got more into it as the season went along. I know the pre-season should have been better this year than last as we know the structure, but at least we know we can stay in games. Let's see where we are after Vegas.

[quote="Wires71":2li5ftgc]So, following your rationale...why sign him? Why play him in the pre-season games and not Ratchford?[/quote:2li5ftgc] I don’t know why you bite, he loves attention it’s that simple.

[quote="rubber duckie":ulqfb8st]His team also finished the season bottom of the league.[/quote:ulqfb8st] Mate this is such a stupid comment it's unreal, i didn't realise London finished bottom because Leyland started every week. Makes you wonder why we play Ratchford, Williams, Ashton, King, Walker, Currie etc because we finished 11th a few years ago, clearly awful players.

[quote="Or thane"]Mate this is such a stupid comment it's unreal/quote] You did see who wrote it?

[quote="Or thane":3iggo12x]Mate this is such a stupid comment it's unreal, i didn't realise London finished bottom because Leyland started every week. Makes you wonder why we play Ratchford, Williams, Ashton, King, Walker, Currie etc because we finished 11th a few years ago, clearly awful players.[/quote:3iggo12x] Incidentally, Salford finished 11th in the season before Ratchford came to us, whereas we had won the LLS. So arguably Ratchford should never have got a game for us.

[quote="rubber duckie":143equo4]they’ll be some eggy faces on here.[/quote:143equo4] shame you wont be able to see them, as you're currently buried under about 10ft of omelette.