[quote="karetaker":17z9i64e]Not so sure about Ratchford, he was not the worse but it was not great. Don’t know who this Russell is you talk of, think him and Musgrove went out for coffee somewhere. Williams was miles off. Lindop was good Vaughan looked good making good metres, Dufty got going in the 2nd half. It is only the first game of the season so a lot to work on and can’t really get down on them since we got the win and that’s important.[/quote:17z9i64e] Yep. Russell ... played... but I hardly noticed him. Musgrove ... did a couple of strong runs then he's taken off. Why? Powell looked completely off the pace. Williams ... I'd have a chat with.

[quote="Wires71":2li5ftgc]So, following your rationale...why sign him? Why play him in the pre-season games and not Ratchford?[/quote:2li5ftgc] I don’t know why you bite, he loves attention it’s that simple.

[quote="rubber duckie":ulqfb8st]His team also finished the season bottom of the league.[/quote:ulqfb8st] Mate this is such a stupid comment it's unreal, i didn't realise London finished bottom because Leyland started every week. Makes you wonder why we play Ratchford, Williams, Ashton, King, Walker, Currie etc because we finished 11th a few years ago, clearly awful players.

[quote="Or thane"]Mate this is such a stupid comment it's unreal/quote] You did see who wrote it?

[quote="Or thane":3iggo12x]Mate this is such a stupid comment it's unreal, i didn't realise London finished bottom because Leyland started every week. Makes you wonder why we play Ratchford, Williams, Ashton, King, Walker, Currie etc because we finished 11th a few years ago, clearly awful players.[/quote:3iggo12x] Incidentally, Salford finished 11th in the season before Ratchford came to us, whereas we had won the LLS. So arguably Ratchford should never have got a game for us.

[quote="rubber duckie":143equo4]they’ll be some eggy faces on here.[/quote:143equo4] shame you wont be able to see them, as you're currently buried under about 10ft of omelette.