Sky's coverage reached a new low last night.

Their pre-occupation with the officials' decisions is awful.

To even suggest an advantage was gained because a ball-boy handed the ball to Russell rather than placing it on the touch line, to where Russell carried on to anyway, was the lowest low point of a series of lows.

Closely followed by Cummings insisting the offside decision following Walsh's sliced bomb was incorrect.

Just awful, awful broadcasting last night.
Despite, dare I say it on here, Phil Clarke's best efforts to keep a balanced and collected viewpoint.

Spat my morning coffee out at that one. Truly bizarre

I've never heard Hemming get genuinely excited over one of our players apart from Sandow when he dropped that goal v Salford. He even creams himself over Jordan Turner ffs.

did i hear stevo yell a sin binning for hughes or westerman for a tackle and their hand dis lodged the ball

It was against evans. Eddie was also clinging onto the hope that saints could get an 8 point try with 50 seconds left....pitiful

thought i heard him yelling for it but wasnt sure of the player involved..makes victory all the more sweeter..

Cummins comment towards the end of the Peyroux VR decision, something along the lines of "What worries me is the amount of looks he might turn it down". Saying things like "What worries me" makes him sound like a fan rather than an impartial (supposed) expert.

Just as sickening was his ... WIDE TO PERCIVAL.... WIDE TO PERCIVAL... WIDE TO PERCIVAAAAAAALLLLLL...

So Steve is off after next week, when is this Wire hating off n'all?

I hope they both end up going, I've had enough of them. I want some commentators who highlight the good parts of the game rather than just court controversy.

Their actual / perceived anti Wire bias doesn't bother me too much to be honest.

However I don't like the 'droning on' about a controversial point (in any match) when it's all done and dusted and the game has moved on.
They simply won't let things lie and that's to the detriment of the coverage.