If after the game he goes into the players lounge Warrington should insist he wears a nappy and for extra security a baby grow.

I do think it's alarming for Wigan that this is the calibre of player they attract.

But it may be that the signing of this no-mark is a clever ruse to make Carmont look reasonable in comparison.

Clever.

It might have to a (c)rap type of tune to it ,a hip hop beat.

Be good if we could come up with decent songs for our own players.Instead of making up songs for a poor player from a small town club.

Perfect thread to read when your eating a chocolate moose.

cant we all just lob fake turds on to the pitch instead.....

Im sure the "normal" Wire posters on here are absoulutely cringing at this thread. Talk about obsessed.

Just for the record, he looked good yesterday at Hull KR, made a couple of breaks and looked sound defensively, big lad aswell.

Loving the "no mark" comment. Remember the exact same being said about George Carmont. Could be worse, we could have signed a vastly over rated over the hill Aussie like Trent Waterhouse.

Oh my ....!
You really think signing a 31 year old former test and state of origin player is worse than signing a kid that has never played first grade rugby and has been sacked from his reserve grade team for ting over floors and tables......

The only comparison I can make between the two is one has a name that rhymes with house......and the other should learn to use one.

If you would actually look into why we have signed Gelling, he was recommended to Wigan by both Dean Bell and Kevin Iro and Wigan had been watching him for quite a while. Signing a 31 year old Aussie stinks of desperation, and proves to me that Tony Smith is not looking to the future, but has ben told by your board to win Super League NOW as your ageing squad is, well......getting older.

So a 23 year old Hill and 23 year old Ratchford as well as signing a 19 year old scrum half at the time says what?