Danny Tickle being touted around by Karl Harrison. Can he play prop I wonder as he`s a driver rather than a runner nowadays? That move would please `redwolf` I`m on the fence.

Not big enough, we have more than enough 2nd rowers, I'd only have been interested if we didn't have a decent kicker and we appear to have 3 regularly starting each game.

Well he`s 5kg heavier than George Griffin.

we don't need him will be like another Phil Bailey. Keep away from him.

I'm on the fence as I think BMM can move to prop easily to accommodate Tickle. But what worries me is why Widnes have let him go? Is it due to an health issue, if it is i'd steer well clear but if otherwise it'd strengthen that bench of ours bigtime.

Not for me.

I can't see anything but tickle providing work for the medical team. He's the kind of signing we would have chomped at three years ago. I'd like to think we have evolved to be shrewder in this department, however, we do seem to have a boner for Widnes rejects at the moment...

to old at 33. I believe Sheens and Watson are looking towards youth, moulding a ream for the future. Tickle would not fit in with that policy

'Moulding a ream.'

I've got some crazy images right now...

think it's fair to say it's dangerous to add a tickle to the Youth policy these days .

bad taste aside , we're not lacking for kickers and with Hauraki - Krasniqi-Forster- Andrade - the Other Walne - Sarsfield- Haggarty & Gee , even Vidot needing some game time that's 9 reasons we don't need a tickle

Seriously..........

[sizeNOPE !!![/size

This guy had three bleeds on the brain. . . . are you f * * * * n stupid?