I've read your posts and thought that you make some valid points in a reasonable way. To WISH harm on a player to make a point is bang out of order. Your posts are also deteriorating into childish tit-for-tat which is doing you no good. Regardless of the incident, which has been dealt with to Hudds satisfaction (After all, he got a straight red which is the max punishment) Like you said with regards to Murphy and Johnson, if all the other Hudds players were 'taken out' then why haven't Salford players been punished for it? Using your argument, it must mean that they didn't do anything yes?

Do yourself a favour and stick to arguing with other Hudds fans, something that you seem to be good at. Because at the rate you are going on here, your posts are going to become embarrassing sometime soon.

any idea how much you contradict yourself? No further justice needed for tasi but wishing injury on murphy- a player who prior to this year had only ever been up before the disciplinary once in his entire career! Penalties are given against players who break the rules of a game. 3 times in 19 games is "getting it wrong" more than most. Even those inexperienced.

But you just did wish it on Locke. Do you suffer from short term memory loss?

We don't know whether they will yet- as the ref bottled one and put it on report. We will see tomorrow.

So he put one on report? But you said that Salford players had taken out half your side? Which means, by your own logic, that only another one incident (possibly) could have occured due to foul play. Your maths don't add up.

No further action needed. It was late, but it wasn't high. He deserved the red card, end of. Where did I say I wished injury on Murphy? I just said it was a shame it wasn't him in the receiving end as opposed to Brough.

Half a side? I said Eorl and robbo were also taken out late- one of those was put on report. The other may yet be brought up by the review panel.
My math is fine- I can subtract 1 away from 13 and get 12 not 10. I also know three isn't half of 17.

it was late, high and reckless, and he could have pulled out, that was my view of it anyway, disciplinary may see it differently though.

I don't think it was late and I don't think the initial contact was high. Reckless? probably, but only because it rode up. Like you said though, disciplinary may see it differently. They also may have better quality highlights than the one I watched which may give a clearer picture.

You were out played by a better team on the day. Show some maturity and accept defeat gracefully rather than trying to keep highlighting the Tasi/Brough incident as if you want some kind of retribution because you lost. These things happen and one of our players was on the wrong end of a broken jaw in the corresponding fixture against you a few weeks back.

Strange the self righteous giants fans seem to have completely ignored the tackle that ended with a player being dumped on his head, a tackle the giants have previous for, but hey it's much easier to recover from a broken jaw than a broken neck

Listening too the game and watching the highlights it struck me what a good game Theo had and I did start to wonder if bringing in Dobson was perhaps a move we didn't need to make. When you throw in that Locke is an excellent kicker (a fact that had totally escaped me until yesterday) maybe the club might have been better bringing in Brierley from Leigh to use as back up in the halves alongside Evalds in an emergency and invested more heavily in a top class hooker.

Theo was the best half on the pitch yesterday IMO. I don't think he's gone as well as some make out this year but yesterday he really stepped up.

i agree, i said to my mates that fages was the best player on the field, rangi gets all the plaudits for his skill etc but fages controlled everything and was popping up everywhere on the field, cracking little player, he would do well along broughy next year