complete nonsense. the slow clapping was not aimed at the player but the length of time it took to get a stretcher onto the park. once he was lifted the whole ground clapped him off. in fact the same thing happened to your first, lengthy injury. yet when one of our players went down (heremaia - always worrying after his disc injury) i noticed only about half a dozen of your fans applauding him when he got to his feet

you played well though, draw would have been a fair result

Enjoying those sour grapes????
It must be tough seeing a young player making his first start for the club tear you a new one, how dare we give young english players a chance in super league!!!

With regards to the match I thought Sidlow was massive for Salford today everytime he took the ball up he looked dangerous getting offload after offload away. You played some good stuff and always looked a danger although our defence left a lot to be desired at times, you took advantage and nearly nicked it at the end (You would have if you didn't blow a 3 v 1 right near the end) good luck for the rest of the season hope you make the playoffs as your attacking brand of rugby is great to watch, also hope Sneyd is ok.

Baffling decisions? I was sat in the home end and it's fair to say that most of the complaining was because people didn't have a full grasp of the laws of the game. I thought he had a good game, the only thing that had us scratching our heads was the decision to still give you the penalty despite having the man sin binned. But, to be fair, that didn't have a great deal of influence over the final result.

As for the slow handclap and cheering when Sneyd was down, around us the "abuse" was still going on when the stretcher appeared and he was being put on it. However, the fact that the loudest cheer of the day was for the referee being injured says a hell of a lot more. Even your mascot was lying on his back, waving his legs in the air to take the p*ss. Really, really classy. The fact that we were close to scoring when he first went down and your lot were more interested in his misfortune is utterly baffling.

The penalty had already been given to Hull for holding down in the tackle. O'Meley lashed out afterwards.

I thought we turned up yesterday and gave it a really good go. We could so easily have won. We bombed a couple of chances and had a golden opportunity to win when Jodie Broughton broke with five minutes or so to go.

I have to say that some of the referee's decisions were baffling. He seemed to see things that nobody else managed to see!

We still make silly errors from time to time though. If only we could cut those out......

I thought that Adam Sidlow made a big difference yesterday and that he stood out in our pack. He made good yards and managed a couple of good offloads. When we moved the ball wide we caused all kinds of problems for Hull and I hope we try to do more of this now the top eighth seems beyond us.

I normally find the Hull fans very sporting at matches. However, the ones around and near me who booed and jeered during the Snyed, Howarth and ref incidents really didn't endear themselves to the good of the game.

Whilst everyone saw different things, what I saw and heard was not respectful. Shouting out "there's nothing wrong with him, get on with it" is hardly correct when a physio is holding someone's head whilst he is laid motionless or the ground. Nor is it appropriate when someone is being strapped into a stretcher. The slow clapping and jeering around me was not respectful.

The cheering at the ref when he fell over is fair enough. Once you realise he is actually hurt is when I think the joke is over. Still baffled as to why he wanted to carry on though for another set.

We all saw and heard different things. What I heard was not typical of Hull's sporting nature; which is a great shame.

Is it not the responsibility of the home club to provide the stretcher ? ( Trawled the RFL site cannot find the appropriate bit )
It took an aeon and must have impressed the FC Under 15 and 16's who were in the stadium.

No surprise that the RFL ban our player,who was the victim of 3 strikes,and only fine O'Meley.
Our injury depleted squad mustn't have sustained enough losses for them.
Once again it is one rule for most clubs and a different agenda for FC.

Hardly a chip on my shoulder - I note the punishment has now altered.
With regard to the one rule I won't attempt to re-write history,or re-read it,but I can easily recall the ineligible
player in the Challenge Cup;FC managed to reach Wembley,that year,and the kudos and financial reward from that and more recently bringing the sport into disrepute with the woeful attempt to cover up the little matter concerning WADA.
Still,any club with 10,000 qualified referees and medical practitioners who can assess injury and appropriate treatment in a matter of seconds obviously deserve special treatment from the RFL.( As at Bradford 10k through the turnstiles seems the magical number )
What the referee didn't see the panel apparently did ! An inspirational captain who refused to be intimidated and that is his reward after 3 separate attempts at him.
I was only at Hull for a Super League game a matter of weeks ago.Passionate,noisy,biased supporters.No complaints from me.They didn't like the referee either - but they have more class and a modicum of decency.