I have noticed a few comments about us not being allowed to pay full salary cap as our income is not enough, despite paying it in the year just gone.

Just wondered if this was a new rule as I don't understand how we could use the full cap last year but not this?

Or could it be a compromise with Rfl for there rumoured 'side payments'

MM so are you saying we can only spend 910k next season on players, or have i misinterpreted mate?

I'm not here to spread a little banter for once.
But i have to laugh as i'm a regular reader of your Forum, and i find it quite amusing at the beef alot of you have going with the resident Italian plumber you seem to have acquired.
But i also think Redwolf could also be one of the same specimens as said Plumber if not the same......
Always asking for clarity in posts always on Rumors ready to file a report in the local rag none of my business mind but i just have a sneaky feeling

That's 50% of the cap.

Basically a club can spend 50% of it's annual turnover, up to a maxium of £1.82m for clubs who's turnover is high enough.

If our turnover was £2m for example, we would only be able to spend £1m. If our turnover was £20m however, we would be only be able to spend £1.82m and not £10m.

I have no idea what the clubs turnover actually was.

Doesn't each SL team a million per season?

The accounts filled for period ending Jan 14 show turnover of 2.2m. On that basis, the salary cap would be set around £1.1m for us.