Hypothetical I know at this stage but . . .

Surely if a player isn't in a position to honor a contract (Non Illness/injury related) he would be in breach and liable for damages. If Salford didn't honor a contract they would be dragged through the courts so why wouldn't it work both ways because Salford have invested a lot of money in the player with a transfer fee etc?

I don't think the Doc would be too chuffed if he had a banned player that cost him iro £70,000 out of his own back pocket!!

From the Warrington forum it seems like dobson is up for grabs.

You seem a little light in the halfback department so I'm surprised you have not been linked with this one as well.

Marc Sneyd was going to be one issue at a board meeting this week at Cas. It's been said we'd do everything possible to keep him.

In the end it will all depend on where he wants to play.

No, as he's a contracted Salford player for next season it will depend on whether Cas have enough cash to tempt the Dr to sell him to you. Call me naive, but I get the impression money really is no object for us at the moment and according to Twitter he's going nowhere. Enjoy him while you can..,

Not really.

If he's under contract, if Cas don't offer money/players, it wont matter what you do or where he wants to play. Harris may want him in the halves next season, especially seeing as he's an academy product with reduced Cap space and he's a kicker which we don't have at the moment.

The fact is, he's a Salford player who will probably be coming back after gaining great first team experience. Barring some cash and/or players in return you are going to have to get used to the fact.

Marc Sneyd is going nowhere.