Way things are going with funding and protectionist attitude of the bigger clubs we will be down to a Supper League of about 8 teams! What a joke. We need a new business model. What are people’s thoughts about the 14 next year and 10 year after could be some mad pressure games mid table! 10 clubs lots of loop fixtures is that what fans want?

People were wrong to assume Leigh's elevation to Superleague made it inevitable they would go down, I was wrong to assume Salford would make way for them by losing their ground thus their SL place. It looks like the 12 will be joined by Fev and TO to make the 14 so French clubs do not look like they will be rejected even if there is no French TV deal.

That 14 clubs are to fight it out for the ten spots means there are no politics, all clubs are even, all 14 clubs have the right to be in a 10 club SL1 league 2023. That's fine.

But once the first division of 10 is finalised do the 4 clubs who get relegated then join the six top clubs in the Championship to make a 10 club SL2? What about the clubs outside the 2x10's??? It'll be great fun at the top end of the pyramid, but carnage amongst those at the broader base?

Will there be a division 3 and if not....................
Will RL in Cumbria be effectively wiped out?
What about Newcastle hoisted up out of League2 by SL clubs favourability if they don't make the top 20?
What about York - well out of the top 20 now?
What about Dewsbury's 146 year history?...........And so it goes on. For me the real "Mad pressure" is on clubs beyond the 20

This is the point about 10 clubs in SL.

It delivers third fixtures between all top clubs. Purists & attendees at grounds are already moaning they don't want to see Wigan play their club three times and prefer that the plan was for 14 Superleague clubs 26 games home and away plus magic.

So does the game listen to SKY or does the game listen to this group of fans? I'd suggest SKY will get what SKY wants as SKY pays and that will be the best viewer ratings, ie. Saints and Wigan for a third time or Salford.v.Huddersfield for a first time

Relegated twice actually.

We never survived on points difference. The year we finished 2nd bottom there was no relegation.

If anything that probably enhances your point tbf..

I'm not necessarily a fan of going to 10 but if it's a starting block and as reported the difference in money between SL1 and 2 won't be huge then once there are a handful of super League 2 sides hitting key targets like attendances sponsorship deals then we could look to increase numbers.

25m for super League 1 is a great deal unfortunately it's more than likely it's for the top two leagues with super League 2 getting the championship treatment of no TV games. Surely there has to be a way of getting SL2 Gabe's on an other broadcaster or free to air TV as a minimum ? Hopefully with two french sides there's s better chance of a TV deal from France these deals don't have to be the same figures sky are paying but will certainly help get more money into all of the league's ontop of sky's money.

Ii did read something about the planned talks and reduced numbers in the league but also mentioned was a new cup somp as would be fewer fixtures ? There are still a few meetings planned so hopefully there will be some info on that ?

Reducing the league to 10 is just an easy solution in trying to get a division which would be higher in quality with a strong league top to bottom.

Its a ridiculous idea which would say that Super League has been a failure and not 'Super' at all.

Most new projects start and then the plan is through time expand the league with new teams but no not Super League. There idea is to cut the top league to 10 teams lol.

Make SL a 20 team league with no salary cap......but a limit on overseas trained players
Year 1, every side gets an equal share of the TV money
Year 2 onwards, your finishing position decides how much central funding you get......210 shares of the TV money......1st place gets 20, last place gets 1. If the cash is £10,000,000 then last place gets you £50k.......first place gets you £1,000,000

A number of things will happen. Firstly, wealthy owners will be allowed to buy success, but more importantly, medium sized and below clubs will be 100% in charge of their own destiny....more fans = more income from tickets, bars, food, merch and sponsors......SL clubs have become lazy and have their 1.8 million a year allocated and spent by Feb each year....this will ensure they have to fight for survival. Every game will matter, with each step on the ladder (table) worth 50k.......Wigan for example will be able to field an academy squad against Swinton, but over time clubs will rise up. The Likes of Argyle are out there....blokes with a passion for the game and deep pockets, but the closed shop of SL with 3k crowds rattling around Salford isn't going to attract them....but clubs like Bradford, Featherstone etc will have a real incentive to get out into the community and get bodies through the turnstiles.

and if clubs go bust, then so be it. They have no right to exist if they solely rely on hand outs and a wealthy owner.....sod bemoaning 130 years of 'istory.....its a professional sport in a busy marketplace...shape up or ship out!

Who don't last five minutes.....Koukash?

As I say...if clubs fold, they fold! We need to stop this protectionist malarky and realise we're a sport fighting for a share of the pot and if we spend less time worrying about Salford or London's reliance on rich blokes and more about figuring out how to attract fans to games we'd be in better shape.
4k+ at PO road today for the top of the table clash....5.5k for Wigan v Wakey last week.....superleague isn't the be all and end all.....there's clubs outside the fence at the moment that could be bigger if given the chance, so stop paying £1.8 million life support and let the dice fall where they will....

Where are these "new teams" going to come from "through time"?

In the 25 years of Superleague there hasn't been much of a "fence" at all most years involved promotion?

The 1.8M isn't life support it's money to pay for the best professional team the SL clubs can find?

There's been a few years where finishing last didn't The 1.8M isn't life support it's money to pay for the best professional team the SL clubs can find?'"

I've just read the LE report saying 10 team SL1&2 are on the cards....which is simply reducing the top tier to try and ring fence the money and improve the product....It only does one of those things IMHO and it's not improving the product!
If they go to a top tier 10 with 2 French sides taking no money, I suspect the game will be dead as a pro sport inside a decade..........

In trying to justify this new proposed set up, Sky saying the poor quality of some games featured raises [at least] three points:

Wigan v Wire was dire - big clubs don't equal good games.

They don't seem to have the same concerns when chucking stupid money at the utterly boring soccerball game.

10 teams playing each other at least 3 times is boring.