But how do you account for Huddersfield in that regard? OK, it wasn't the SL era but i remember when they were down and out and dead and buried. With the right backing any club can rise from the doldrums - even in the modern era. Life has always been cack outside the top flight and yet your Oldhams, Swintons and even your Doncasters are still around - in spite of themselves and in spite of the dire predicament they keep finding themselves in. Stand back and take a look at the game as a whole? Is it better than it was 20 year ago? I think it is. It just needs that impetus to kick on and expand.

could not agree more. far better rugby played in the lower leagues. the only reason they dont beat SLteams when they meet is they are out muscled and rarely out played.

if my team do not receive another franchise i would not miss SL one bit.
an extra £30 in my pocket and not SKYs and i will happily support my team at dewsbury , batley or wherever.

SL is not the be all and end all.

Oh codswallop.
Your chp has been better with all our dual reg players this year but that game last night was like watching grass grow. Ive said it before, the only people who prefer watching chp games are chp clubs fans and thats because, like some pre pubescent teen in high school who bought the wrong games console for christmas, telling themselves over and over again might somehow make it true.
That game, the leigh game t'other week and so on was a SHAMBLES. if that's good rugby then im the pope.

SL has gone a little boring, like the NRL of 07ish, we need 2 referees: problem solved

You make some valid points but it's all a question of taste - genuinely. Some people genuinely like bramley apples, others genuinely prefer Granny Smith's. Doesn't make either a "pre-pubescent teen". I've also read your posts regarding one-sided Championship matches where one side gets a mullering because of terrible defence. What say you of tonight's match? Competitive? Hull KR making it a tight match?

I would never be so arrogant as to tell people what brand of Rugby League they should be enjoying.

"Normal service is resumed" says Eddie as Saints run in [ianother[/i try. I've not enjoyed watching rugby this much for years as I have this season (not just Leyth, by the way), but I'm afraid that few of those games have been Super League matches.

Are you sure you're not just miguided like Dico suggests? He's better placed than you are to make a judgement because he's a fan of a SL club. Please doff your cap next time.

It's been poor for a couple of years Matt since they brought it up to 14 teams. Dreadful every week! They need to do something in my view to make it less of a forwards battle and it more about skill and play from the backs.

Sorry, sir. Won't do it again, sir.

*shuffles feet*

Speed it up.

Think the interchange laws have killed it, to be honest as you'd got permanently fresh forwards on the field.

What club would that be then? Because last time I checked, Stade Francais XIII was not an established club in Paris. They have an established union team, but so what? What has changing London Broncos to Harlequins Rugby League done for them?

If a S14 club from South Africa decided to put in an NRL bid, would the NRL drop everything for them?

Look sunshine. It's French innit? It's Paris - it has that certain [ije ne sais quoi [/i, ergo, it's gonna bloody work! Just take Dally M's word for it! You can't mention the Harlequins comparison either. It doesn't fit into Dally's "Westworld".

take out the link up with quins and you would have no RL anymore in london.

ive already answered the second question, shame your reading skills havent improved

what did you guys do to this thread.

that last page was the biggest tripe ive ever read.

some of you lot dont deserve to be RL fans, jeeze you whinge and moan.

SL is going great guns. if you arent happy with it, go and watch soccer

You're funny

I won't sink to your level and your AFL desertion.

almost as funny as being a leigh fan and not attending an international RL game held in your home town hey

not bad.

almost makes up for reading all that depressing drivel earlier on.

wah wah, RL used to be so much better, SL they are just boring robots, championship etc etc

What does that tell you about the areas prospects if the choice is no club or a poorly supported financially draining club that doesn't really have much of a future in its current guise?

If that's the choice in Paris, I'd rather promote someone else. Thanks for helping make my point.



Have you?



I don't see any mention in there about the NRL, or about dropping other plans. You mentioned about what you'd do to expand into a tough market. Not that you'd pick that over expanding into planned market with less glamour but more chance of success.

Just answer the question rather than do your usual "dodging the bullet" style replies which don't get anybody anywhere. If a S14 team from South Africa decided they wanted an NRL team, would you cancel all your expansion plans and let them in over the rest?

Think your a bit out of order there Dally,the likes of Halifax,Widnes,Leigh have got a lot of history in RL and they have as much right as anyone else to have an opinion and to go and tell them to watch soccer is very arrogant.

It's true though.
I do enjoy watching RL at all levels and my post earlier was a bit cheeky more than anything but Chp standard rugby is not as entertaining as SL. People say it's more free flowing but i'd rather (as should most people) watch structured attack and defense anyday over the chp who, lets be honest, are just turning into poor SL clones as every year goes by in an atmosphereless cesspit.

I didn't see much of a structured defence from Hull KR last night.

It was a poor game, Hull KR are a very average team and it doesn't exactly back up my argument.
Until you watch a game like Wigan/Wire et al

just for you wellesey because you cant read, i would support a SA NRL license but not at the cost of our planned expansion, which is exactly what ive argued here, but you are too thick to work out.

its like having teeth pulled out i tell you

hey if someone misses a tackle in the championship, is that richard lewis' fault?