That wont happen thats why we have to get out of the M62

2 years ago you could have easily argued that ‘the wakefield experiment’ had failed. London isn’t an experiment. It is an RL club in the same way Wakefield are an RL club. As for who picks up the tab when the Sugar daddy leaves? Well yes, someone has to. But you could ask that about Wakefield, and most other clubs. And especially about a club like Fev.

It doesn’t make sense to argue on one hand it is a bad thing that London are reliant on a sugar daddy because they aren’t reaching their potential, then argue they should be replaced by a club like Fev who would be miles away from getting the 10k needed to break even and where there is very very little potential that they will ever reach that level.


Post office road currently holds about 7k. Even if they sold out every single week, they would be 30% below the minimum sustainable level. Even if they got a new stadium and every single person in the town attended, they would still be getting 3/4/5k less than the big clubs.

There is also the matter that, in the interests of the wider game, every player brought through by an SL Fev, every new fan attracted by Fev could be attracted by Cas or Wakefield. The game doesn’t benefit from needlessly dividing its support base and player base between 3 clubs instead of 2 or 1.

There are a few SL clubs who don't meet your min sustainable level, so that argument/criteria is null and void.

The argument would only lack validity if you were some kind of moron.

Im well aware that some clubs don’t meet that level now, the answer is to get them up to that level not continually replace them with other clubs who also aren’t at that level and don’t even have the potential to get there.

Thought the well informed would know that Fev have purchased two 1300 seater stands from Scarborough FC,
soon to be erected.
They will substantially increase capacity.

by 2600, which still isnt enough, even if they were filling them.

.

When a club is propelled into the premier league like London were, that's an experiment in my eyes.

Regarding sustaining clubs, if London were to go bust you would be advocating a rescue plan, if it was a Wakefield or Featherstone you would happily wave goodbye.



I would suggest Featherstone would be far more likely to get nearer 10k gates than London ever will & I know you'll go on about the shear size of the Capital, however, they're just not interested, it's like trying to introduce a croquet league in Cas.




Once their new stand is up I've no idea how many it will hold, however, they do own the ground & save a shed load of cash not having to pay rent for P.O.R. As for their crowds, I'm sure they could manage 7k quite quickly, it's not like there's much else to do round there.



Fair point, however, due to the parochial nature of the area, supporters don't tent to swap allegiances, it's not Leeds you know .

.
I Cant see the logic in that.

I think we should have a club in London. Whether that needs to be the Bronco’s or not I’m not sure. I don’t think that they are doing a perfect job, certainly on the playing and attendance side of things, but they are doing a pretty outstanding job at the youth development, community etc, side of things.



Do you really believe that? When have Fev ever got close to 10k averages in their history?
And of course the people in the capital aren’t interested, the game as a whole ranges between doing nothing at all and poor efforts to get them interested. There are many amateur and youth players in London, this shows that there are people interested in the game, the fact they aren’t interested in the club is down to the club and their efforts.



It is a very parochial area and some fans would refuse to support any other club. But Fev only have a relatively small hardcore of fans. I Where are these extra 5.5k fans who would attend an SL Fev and why arent they attending Wakefield or Cas now considering they are new fans Fev would need to bring in rather than existing fans?

Fev just isn’t a place that could sustain a pro RL club. The harsh fact is Fev in SL would be competing with clubs hugely better suited to it and they couldn’t compete. ,

I'm all for Feath having a crack at SL and admire how they go about their business but I'd be utterly stunned if they could get consistently anywhere near 7K, that would be about a third of the town which would be a massive ask.

Well then you clearly don't know your local area. Fev are de facto Pontefract's team and always have been.

Featherstone had a similar average than Wakefield when both were in the old first division - so I wouldn't look down your nose at them if I were you.

However one thing is for sure they will always out average London and will always produce good players.

You cannot sell a game to a population that doesn't want it - what part of that don't you understand.

Be strong where you are strong and that is the M62 corridor like it or not.

You defeat your own argument with HMV as and example - that was a big, heavily branded, well publicised national chain - everything you want! However no customers, can you see a pattern here?

HMV comet refused to expand into the Internet - now they have gone. Others stole the market

You cant tell me with the millions of people in London and SE there aren't 10K who want to watch RL- The potential is there if marketing is used. That is the current failure
Fev would get 2-4 k per game and you know it-That is the Max they could get. The target area is so small.

This is among your dumbest posts yet, and there is some stiff competition. In the hope of helping you and putting a stop to your nonsense ill tell you why

firstly, the population of London arent one homogeneous entity that took a vote and decided it didnt want the game.

Secondly, RL barely registers, that is the issue, not that people have looked at it and not liked it, but that they dont pay any attention to it in the first place

Thirdly, there is nothing unique in the people of the m62 corridor that means they like RL but people from other areas wont. To suggest there is something inherent in people from certain places only liking certain things suggests a misunderstanding of so many basic tenents of humanity I am honestly astounded that it could be suggested by anyone who wasnt wearing pants on their head and a necklace made of their own teeth.

fourthly, you can sell things to people who think they dont want it. In fact thats what a salesperson does. Someone only gives things to people who already want it arent salespeople, they are order takers.

fifthly, HMV is an ideal example, a company which didnt move with the times, instead of changing its model when the world changed and leading in expanding their on-line sales and instead stuck to 'being strong where they are strong' then watched as the world passed them buy. The fact that the likes of play.com, lovefilm, netflix exist is testament to HMV's failing by being strong where they are strong. In years to come pupils of Business Studies will use HMV as a case study in a strong, successful business, with a recognised quality brand, dying because they focused on 'being strong where they are strong' and not adapting to an ever changing world.

At last- sadly the flatcappers wont accept what you are saying

They live in a insular village mentality. Because they sell 10 cup cakes at the village fair they think they know sales like Phillip Green

someone didn't do their research

HMV did move with the times, they sell online and they diversified their stock to sell clothing, electronics, books etc, but a company thats over reached expanding(there is a phrase some fans would find relevant ) by buying up every plot of land they could ala GAME, just can't compete with a company that has no bricks and mortar stores to pay rent on and no tax to pay.

unless of course by 'moving with the times' you meant sell all the shops and move to jersey