Show me a clip where is Sinfield shouts at any official in the aggressive tantrum style of Danny Brough! Please show me!

Thats right you cannot.

Sinfield is the upmost professional, yes he questions the referee but as already aluded to, which captain doesn't?






I guess you're referring to the word 'Bent'? Which can be a homophobic terms but also can be a term for corrupt. Both are wrong, one far worse than the other. You don't know which one he meant and neither does anyone else. Im not defending him in any way what so ever, just stating facts.




Oh so players can treat him like a fu**ing dog? What planet do you live on?





I beg to differ. Thats laughable. The Irony meter has gone through the roof!!!!

Brough is the captain he can talk to the ref.

Just the same as Mcguire was doing lastnight.

we all know how much Brough wants to win, he is the ultimate competitor and it gets the better of him sometimes, still id rather have him in our side than on the opposite side.

we have had the rough end of some decisions this season already, shows no sign of turning yet

Correct. Key word, TALK. No scream and shout TALK.

And here for some honesty: I would have Brough at Leeds for his playing ability. If you forget Sinfields legacy then Id swap him for Sinfield right now. Huddersfield are lucky to have him. However I really would be embarrassed by his dummy spits.

You may have been at the rough end of some calls but didn't you have 7 penalties in a row prior to this? So that cannot really be taken into account.

Sometimes broughy does go over the top and i find myself urging him to just walk away and calm down. But in a tight game like last night were you think you've been wronged then ofc you're you'd have a go and let your emotions go. It's professional sport and the consequences of a win vs a loss are massive to these guys! Think Silverwood has used some common sense and empathy and handled it well from what I've seen watching it back on telly, calmly explains his decision which is a close call but ultimately right.

It's not a close call. It's a clear penalty. The second Watkins lends weight to the tackle then the player is held and the tackle is complete. The defenders have to stop, in the same way as if Keinhorst's ball carrying arm had hit the ground.

There's no reason for Brough to be so outraged about a clear decision. He should be annoyed at himself and his teammates for not paying attention to what's going on.

As mentioned by others, he's a cracking player, but he shouldn't be allowed to talk to officials in that manner. The TJ shouldve had the balls to go onto the pitch and report it to Silverwood and make him punish Brough in some way. Another 10m downfield would be appropriate in my opinion.

Nobody is disputing that Brough should be able to query decisions with the referee.

If you can't see the difference though between the way he confronted the TJ and his conversation 30 seconds later with Silverwood that was caught on ref cam, you're an idiot.

We haven't 'forgotten' that, it simply doesn't happen. What Brough did last night was dissent, what Maguire did last week was dissent, what Sinfield does is respectfully question, occasionally forcefully, but never in the same postcode as dissent.



I don't think anyone has said that about Peacock, it seems you are saying it about Brough though...



Let's have a look at that 'atrocious' record. There was that time he got done for the completely unacceptable homophobic slur, then there was that erm... that other thing he did on the pitch, you know, where he... know, can't think of anything. Must just be that one offence.




He wasn't though was he? He did ask why only one team seemed to be getting penalised, and how on earth can you give a phantom obstruction against Leeds but not see an actual Hudds one, and any captain would talk to the ref after 7 pens in 20 mins, but by any standard he was not 'constantly after' him. You may recall Brough leaping up in to the refs face after Delaney's try, demanding to know how it was allowed - does that constitute 'constantly' as well?



You're about to imply it below. Have a read.



The game doesn't have rules, it has laws, and you obviously don't know them. As soon as anyone moves into a position where they're pulling rather than pushing the tackle is complete (that happened) and as soon as an opposition player lends weight against the tackle it's complete (this happened as well) and as soon as the ref calls held the tackle is complete (unbelievably this also happened) so whatever way you look at it, the tackle was complete and the Hudds players took him out of bounds. Penalty all day long, every day and for every team in League. Danny Brough does know the laws, he just doesn't like them.



It's implied by your sympathy for him but utter lack of it towards any Leeds player.



No you don't.



Normally people who patronise at least try and make sure their points are correct though. Now hold your breath. Hold it. Keep holding...

[sizeHey Avenger[/size

I like the idea they have in the NRL (even though they don't always stick to it) of captains only being able to speak to officials and at designated times.

We should have the same rule, and enforce it.

Calm down calm down, no need to revert to insults

Do people still say that, how juvenile!

Like I said it's laughable how Rhino fans see the world around them!

Oooh, you sure burned me by not being able to refute anything I've just said.

Go back and read the juvenile, confused, bitter dogpoop you've written on this thread.

Then say that again.