No Bill. It is you. And its very disappointing that this attitude is still as rife as it is,

But there is ' personal choice ' , or in your world maybe there isn't

There is personal choice indeed, and i have no criticism of a persons personal choice

What i would say however. Is there is still no positive reason for that person to make that choice.

Which shows we have a problem.

If we have no Gay Players, we have a problem

If we have Gay players but they feel the need to hide their sexuality, we still have a problem

That persons choice is their choice and their choice only, The fact they needed to make that choice at all is our problem

As i said, Disappointing

to a discussion about sexuality in children , both subjects not relevant to RL , no matter how much you try to pretend they are

The VT is after all a board to discuss RL issues , not other spots or sexual matters , we have other boards for those subjects

Does that apply to Rugby Union threads too? Or articles about Rugby Union blaming Rugby League for its problems or authors of articles about Rugby Union blaming Rugby League for its problems?

No, but Starbug's seen this thread and it's content plenty of times, so why does he continue to open the thread and complain about it?

Smoking jackets and cravats went out a long time ago Wheels , you really do need to find a new tailor [ you could do with a shave as well



'"

It would seem so, however my lesbian daughter and her gay friends might argue with that.

As is often the case Smokey is arguing a completely different point to the one actually being discussed i.e. the sexual awareness (or lack of) in children 8 or 9 years old.