DG - it's not too long, and I've thrown in some pictures to keep your concentration up. So stick with it, you can do it if you concentrate.
Quote ="Durham Giant"shiite:
ardvark in I know better than the specialist lawyers... '"
Hmmm...
Quote ="Durham Giant"
The fact is that either their legal advice was poor or ...'"
Durham Giant in I know better than the specialist lawyers shocker
Quote ="Durham Giant"yet more shiite:
At the end when it came to who thought they could win the Bulls or their legal team said, " we need to cut our losses we wont win". '"
Durham Giant in Stevo style "imaginary conversation" shocker
Quote ="Durham Giant"...in a court case where i have no real knowledge of all the evidence shocker. '"
So, you comment at length about a case where YOU have no real knowledge of the evidence - whilst criticising other people who you presume have no real knowledge of the evidence for doing just what you are. Whoosh!
Quote ="Durham Giant"Then you wonder why i ignore half the shiite you write.'"
Yes, I sit awake at night, reading back every post I ever made, cross-checking whether Durham Giant did or didn't reply to it, and if any post appears to have been ignored by Durham Giant, I spend endless hours wondering why. No, really. Please don't ignore any more of my posts, I do fret so.
Quote ="Durham Giant"even more shiite:
If only the Bulls board had you as their legal advisor Bradford would have won the case, it would be Leeds who would be bankrupt and the Bulls who would be lording it all up.'"
It doesn't matter who acted for the Bulls, all these things might have come to pass had the case gone to a full hearing. We will obviously never know.
Quote ="Durham Giant"Neither do you know what the defence was . '"
He may not, but I do, I read it. You could have done the same had you attended the court office and asked. Although the rules as to who can see what pleadings are a bit stricter these days.
Quote ="Durham Giant"more shiite:
Hence they gave in....'"
No, they did not give in. They came to a SETTLEMENT with Leeds. Look up the meaning of the word if you are unclear. "Giving in" would be withdrawing their Defence and letting the court assess damages and costs. Durham Giant in deliberate misrepresentation shocker.
Quote ="Durham Giant" I would guess that if they had fought on that the legal fees could have doubled '"
Oh, I see - so it is OK for Durham Giant to spout forth, even if it is a pure "guess". But again, you miss the point. It is also perfectly possible that if they had fought on they would have won, and not had to pay anything at all. That much is 100% indisputable.
Quote ="Durham Giant"more shiite:
That is why they gave in to cut their losses. '"
No, that is not why they settled. I explained the reasons why they settled.
Quote ="Durham Giant"his usual pathetic attempt at ad hominem shiite:
You cannot make it up except in Aardvark world. Yopu should give up law and become a Sci Fi writer you could take over the role of Tery Pratchett. Just swap Discworld for Anteater world. '"
Do you feel better for having these schoolboy pops? They are cringeworthy for an adult to make. I tell you this as a mate, you're just making a fool of yourself with it, and if it is meant to have some effect on me, it makes me laugh.
You'd have been better actually responding to what I said. I of course note that you don't, and of course that's because you can't. Sadly no amount of bluster and veering off topic to your normal ad hominem detracts from the sound thrashing your "arguments" have had and not just from me.
