I think a champion side would have kicked on there and hit 50+.

Absolutely. We ain't winning anything this year.

McDermott and Clarke arguing like two blokes in a pub.

Clarke whinging about the wingers being offside at the ptb.
Where has he been the last 20 years?
If he wants to look at bending the rules, he needs to look no further than his beloved cherry and whites when the were successful.

Bitter. Much?

That was awful. No wonder Sky want rid. It was like watching 2 cripples go foe to toe. The super league big clubs....st Helens, would have put a cricket score past both of them

Embarrassing and yet against in front of an empty stadium

Not sticking up for them but their attendances are consistently higher than saints. Only when saints play one of the teams on their doorstep do their attendances get above 10k, otherwise appear to sit around the 9k mark.

Is this a copy and paste from one of your constant rants about Salford? I'm sure the attendance was fine and they have no worries about folding at any moment due to lack of bums on seats.

Now have you got anything interesting to say? I won't hold my breath....

11k + there - Hull promoted the game well.

Wow, even by your standards this is inappropriate. Please can one of the mods have a quiet word with LeBron, sorry Ruune, as I find this remark extremely offensive.

You fear us most, don't you?

You'd be right to, especially when we have a better recent record of getting over the final hurdle than you. You know your team falls at the last.

You really need to bin your book of sick comments.

Your post annoy's me more than his. I''m more in favour of him being allowed to have his opinion than you trying to strip him of that.

And herein lies the problem with RLFans. The guy is a constant WUM and I'm embarrassed for you that you're actually backing him up. It's even sadder that you didn't get the irony in my post but somehow I'm not surprised.



The lunatics have well and truly taken over the asylum.

Not sure what’s the more concerning. London’s inabilities in the first half, hull putting the. Cue in their rack in the second or the number of rovers fans on here trying to convince people 11,400 is a poor attendance for a Thursday night game.

Yes embarrassing even by your low standards.
Just remind us all again ruuBron108 which team beat you earlier in the season

Thursday night vs London - that is a very impressive attendance. Well done Hull.

I think the argument this week isn't whether it should have been Leeds v Rovers or Saints v Wigan - it clearly shoudl have been both of them and last night's game shouldn't have been close to TV.

I am a hull kr fan I do not like hull but 11 400 on a Thursday night is great

You really don`t like Hull do you,what happened ,a player run off with your mrs?

What would be embarrassing would be televising a game on which a cricket score had been scored - hardly going to draw people in or keep their interest.

9,090

How embarrassing that the best team in the league by some distance could only get marginally more that 9k v London.

But then again, your opinion, to which you are fully entitled, carries as much gravitas as Baldricks.

Must have been 9000 mutes

9,090 was the attendance at the St Helens v London game earlier this season. I have no idea if they were mutes, I wasn't there.

Mr obsessed much? The fan putting your attendance down is a saints fan.

Try again

Haha, I’ll give you Ronnie, but not Yorkie. He’s only mentioned atmosphere, which I don’t think anyone could argue with.