Heard a podcast,a few months ago.New rugby league fan,in Australia.hosting Phil Caplan.
Amongst the discussion was the fact that RUGBY has been monopolised by the other code.
A change of name is required.
In 1895,of course,the name RUGBY did not feature,it became Northern Union.
As folk can,apparently tell the difference between,netball,basketball and football,the notion that LEAGUEBALL should replace rugby league/Super League,did it for me.
The clubs hardly call themselves RLFC,anymore.
Scrums may not come back.
The sport needs a new,younger audience.
Leagueball may be the way to go.

Just have 1 game playing on Thursday, then one on Friday. Cats are usually on Saturday,and the rest just play on Sunday

Not sure what you mean there.

Usually you have 2 or 3 super games on a Friday along with the sky game

If us Wigan or Leeds on the same night that's 30,000 at a game instead of figures on sky

Play Saturday night and Sunday 6.35 like they used to

I don't know if you're making this up or just have bad information but you're completely wrong. Super League viewing figures are up for the 3rd straight year and are at a 7 year high. I work for a media company and have access to all BARB viewing data before you question my source.

Sky paid less because they could, simple as that.

I know that's a logical assumption but it just doesn't work like that, viewing figures are largely unaffected when games are played at the same time.

Even if 30k were at home and not at a game, less than half will have Sky and not all of those would choose to watch so in practical terms you'd be lucky if there were 5-10k extra viewers.

In reality, viewing figures are measured by BARB boxes which are connected to TV's across the country, there are 5,000 of these boxes collecting a random sample, audiences for these boxes are then multiplied up to estimate the total audience across the country. Statistically its unlikely any of those attending games that would be watching on Sky otherwise actually have a box and would show up on the viewing figures at all.

The main influence on viewing figures are what channel the game is shown on, Sky Sports Main Event adds 20-50k viewers and what else is on TV at the time.

I just despair at the constant chopping and changing, rebranding and spreading glitter on. 90% of the ideas that the powers that be come up with alienates a big proportion of the existing fans base. Growing something shouldn't mean losing the existing.
You only have to look at other sports to understand how hard it will be to get grass roots thriving, huge sports like the NFL have never broken through outside there homeland. Yes people will watch it on the tv but they'll watch the US teams not the diluted uk version, baseball is another even go as far a Basketball which although it has a big following just hasnt caught on at uk club level. All these sports get huge media coverage with household names playing but yet very little participation, home crowds or TV coverage. What chance has RL have of spreading abroad if these behemoths cant manage it.
The only way to grow RL is to get the home product better and grow crowds steadily from within, dont scrap clubs, try mergers or set up a league akin to scottish football. The cap needs looking at but not to return to the days of Lindsays Wigan.

As someone said above sky funding reduced but that wasnt just RL, it was across the board and they did it because they could, they know leaving sky would be the deathknell of professional RL and as such they can name the price.