Quote ChrisGS="ChrisGS"Well Docker wasn't suspended for his tackle on Graham last week. Why not?
The Beau Falloon one this week was on report, but that's it. The rest either resulted in a mere penalty or weren't noticed by refs. That one on Burgess the ref took about 10 seconds to call (probably had video ref in his ear), he wasn't even gonna call it and the commentators were going nuts.
If you had the inclination to start freezing the frame every time a players legs were lifted off the ground you'd discover that a lot of dangerous lifting tackles are ignored or the refs are far too soft on them when they do decide to "punish" players. Certainly the NRL don't react in any way that could be considered a serious deterrent, hence why they happen so many times each game.
I might make a compilation from one of the games next week to show you what I mean'"
Because he was only charged with a Grade 1 Dangerous Throw (which only constitutes 125 demerit points) and submitted an early guilty plea. As each 100 points received by a player results in a 1-match suspension, the early guilty plea came into play. The answers are out there if you care to look.
A penalty is still recognition of the offence by the referee. The Sam Burgess lift was in reality about 2 seconds. 10 seconds in RL is another tackle at least. Yes, the ref paused but the penalty and 'on report' was given. Was that the correct decision? Not in my opinion.
Look, as I've said, whether the punishments in the NRL have been sufficient is debatable. But my point remains - some have been saying these tackles have been let go, ignored, unpunished. That simply is not true. Whether the punishments are severe enough is another matter and absolutely needs looking at.