A referee with a sunbed tan and White boots. Discuss...

Given the lack of consistency you are right, as that try was exactly the same as the one Warrington were given.

But it was the right decision today as a dummy runner deliberately makes contact with a defender who isn't looking for him. Lomax played it well, putting his arms up and looking round Tomkins as he ran into him, making it obvious he wasn't going for the dummy runner.

Saints were unlucky on the reversed decision for a few reasons. One, it was Childs as touch judge and not one of the anonymous ones that wouldn't raise the flag for anything and secondly the pass that Shenton touched was miles forward in the first place.

Decision to scrum was correct. Decision to blow whistle was wrong.

If the ref mistakenly blows whistle, decision is scrum to team in posession.

In this instance, what would have been the difference anyway? Wigan had ball back at zero - instead had a scrum for tackle 1.

You make easy metres from a scrum and it disrupts the defensive line.

Saints touched the ball, Wigan got it back - should have been play on at tackle 1, with a broken defensive line, but ref blew up wrongly.

On acknowledging the mistake, he correctly gave scrum to Wigan, slightly further back down the field. Saints therefore had a structured defence back in play.

No drama there for Saints. Refs only mistake was not playing on with Wigan at zero and a broken field to attack.

He wears them quite often but they looked shocking with an all black kit.

Should have worn some of the neat black Asics ones that the others wore