| FORUMS > The Virtual Terrace > Dragging in to touch and Touch Downs |
 |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 113 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Aug 2008 | 16 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Dec 2010 | Oct 2010 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
: |
|
|
The tries given yesterday were entirely correct as per the rules of the game. At no point do the rules state that the player has to have control but they do state downward pressure. The replays clearly show that for the first try at no point did the player lose contact with the ball. For a knock-on to have been given the ball has to leave contact with the player and hit either another player and/or the ground. As for the second try the ball was stripped 2 on 1 and as per the rules as of last year a penalty try could not be awarded but as the Cats player grounded the ball after the strip then the greater advantage was to award the try rather than the penalty. Correct as per the rules of the game.
As for the penalty awarded for taking the player into touch, it wasn't for the dragging into touch but because as per the interpretations this year where an upright tackle occurs, if the player in possesion has a leg lifted off the ground then the referee calls held which in this case he clearly did twice hence the penalty.
Nothing has changed with regards attacking players lending weight but laying a hand on is not enough they have ato lend weight and make a difference.
|
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 2697 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Nov 2005 | 19 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Aug 2013 | Aug 2013 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
18821_1298880800.jpg
[quote='Fishsta"']I've always thought of McGuire as a good player, and I wouldn't normally wish injury on any player, but there was a certain hint of poetic justice to that.
[/quote]
Another classic:
[quote='Fishsta']You forgot to take off the "Saints Reduction Factor" when calculating the ban.
Standard suspension / Saints Reduction Factor = Actual ban for Saints player.
Therefore (2 / 3) = 0.666
0.666 < 1 therefore actual ban equals "less than 1 match".
Therefore ZERO.[/quote]
Give the girl her dummy back.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_18821.jpg |
|
| Quote: ladyref "There was nothing grey about the Liam Watts try. As I said earlier in order for a knock-on to be given the ball doesn't just have to leave the hands, it has to hit someone or something else whilst travelling towards the opposition's dead ball line. With the try you are talking about whilst the ball left his hands before the ground he regained contact with it before it hit the ground or anything or anyone else hence the try was correctly given. Have you never seen a player juggle the ball in the air? Is that a knock-on?
With the upright tackle you were talking about the player clearly had his leg lifted off the floor and as per the interpretations which were brought in this year with consultation and request from the SL coaches the referee correctly shouted held on more than one occasion before giving the penalty.'"
Yea, if it hits the floor before he catches It again. |
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 1194 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jun 2010 | Jun 2010 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
I was born to be a Rhino like my dad
I was born to be a Rhino like my mum
I was born to be a Rhino
Born to be a Rhino
Not like you
You xxxxing inbred scum: |
|
| Quote: ladyref " in order for a knock-on to be given the ball doesn't just have to leave the hands, it has to hit someone or something else whilst travelling towards the opposition's dead ball line. quote]
So can you please explain to me why there are so many knock-ons awarded in situations where the ball clearly travels backwards ? I don't understand that one .
Nor do I understand why when at the PTB if the player connects the ball with his foot and it goes forwards is it sometimes given as a knock on ? Incorrect PTB I could accept .
Also , while we are on subjects such as these , Is the correct way to PTB to place it on the ground and roll it backwards with your foot ?
It is a lot of years since I played . I remember contested scrums  Studs in the knees and a punch in the face for the front row if you were lucky .
|
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Board Member | 5064 |  |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Aug 2002 | 22 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Sep 2017 | Feb 2016 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
Others/bones.jpg
(23:25:06) Thecko: who'd want to rent a book?
(23:25:10) Thecko: oh, libraries  :Others/bones.jpg |
|
| Quote: ladyref "Have you never seen a player juggle the ball in the air? Is that a knock-on?'"
Well, yes, if this is the correct definition of a knock-onKNOCK-ON means to knock the ball towards the opponents’ dead ball line with hand or arm, while playing at the ball.'"
So if whilst juggling the ball the player has knocked the ball towards his opponents' dead ball line he has knocked on.
According to the copy of the laws I have play should continue [iafter[/i a knock-on in certain circumstances (the player regaining/kicking the ball). None of which are relevant to the Watts try. Although I do appreciate that the laws of the game as practised by the officials are different to those we mere fans are allowed to know of.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 113 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Aug 2008 | 16 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Dec 2010 | Oct 2010 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: LS13 "
So can you please explain to me why there are so many knock-ons awarded in situations where the ball clearly travels backwards ? I don't understand that one .
Nor do I understand why when at the PTB if the player connects the ball with his foot and it goes forwards is it sometimes given as a knock on ? Incorrect PTB I could accept .
Also , while we are on subjects such as these , Is the correct way to PTB to place it on the ground and roll it backwards with your foot ?
It is a lot of years since I played . I remember contested scrums Studs in the knees and a punch in the face for the front row if you were lucky .
Quote: LS13 " in order for a knock-on to be given the ball doesn't just have to leave the hands, it has to hit someone or something else whilst travelling towards the opposition's dead ball line. quote]
So can you please explain to me why there are so many knock-ons awarded in situations where the ball clearly travels backwards ? I don't understand that one .
Nor do I understand why when at the PTB if the player connects the ball with his foot and it goes forwards is it sometimes given as a knock on ? Incorrect PTB I could accept .
Also , while we are on subjects such as these , Is the correct way to PTB to place it on the ground and roll it backwards with your foot ?
It is a lot of years since I played . I remember contested scrums Studs in the knees and a punch in the face for the front row if you were lucky .
Yes I can, whilst the ball may appear to travel backwards the initial momentum from the hands or arm is forwards towards the opposition dead ball line.
As for your issues with the ptb most times it is not a deliberate act the same as a forward pass is not a deliberate attempt at teaching. Players don't lift their feet high enough and the laws actually state that the ball can be dropped or placed on the floor. If indeed the referee thinks it is a deliberate act then a penalty will be given otherwise just like with a forward pass or accidental off-side the scrum is awarded to the non offending team. As an ex player I'm surprised you didn't know and understand all of this.
I refereed a junior game recently where not only was the scrum contested but was won against the head quite legally.
|
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 104 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2007 | 17 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Oct 2016 | Feb 2015 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
35606.jpg
:35606.jpg |
|
|
In my view it's the laws on tries that need to be changed. I agree with LadyRef, that these tries are mostly being given correctly in line with the current laws, but I also agree with the view that the law needs to be changed to having full control of the ball (ie, having hold of the thing) or 'downward pressure with the palm of the hand' if the ball is loose. Let's get rid of tries that are given if someone brushes the ball with a fingertip or rolls their forearm over a loose ball. They might be in the laws of the game, but I don't think that enough skill is involved for them to be in the spirit of the game.
That should also make it easier for refs who don't have access to a VR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
