That money is remedial maintenance to make a condemned stand barely usable again. Hardly a significant "improvement". The ground is disgrace - all the more so because it was built at a time when stadium architecture meant that there simply is no excuse for obstructed views, etc.

Not in abbreviated accounts they don't.

Why not spend a few £ on downloading the readily available accounts from Companies House, get someone to read them to you and then come back and give us all the breakdown? So far a couple of qualified accountants on the Hull board and the HDM have failed to find this breakdown information.

well newspaper articles shoudnt be based on abbreviated accounts should they?

from what i read in the link the person that wrote the article sure didnt look further than the abbreviated accounts.

as i said, its a case of poor 1st year accounting

if the paper wants a more accurate analysis they should pay me to look at them and ill write a more accurate article

The abbreviated accounts are all that's available for a company with the turnover of an RL club.

You ought to stop pretending that you know what you're talking about. It's just making you look foolish.

I dont know what the hell you accountants are talking about, but it sure aint too appealing a topic to investigate!

This thread is as dead a dead thing on dead day.