The obvious club to demote is Salford, their ground is dreadful, their crowds are poor, their on field results are poor they have been given a licence by telling blatant lies. It is disgraceful that a "Super League" club attracted a smaller crowd when they played Huddersfield, than York did against Oldham in the same week.

Perhaps this message board isn't loaded full of as many idiots as I thought. Maybe they're all just Dally.

Quote: rover49 "Since we applied The pitch was substantially improved in 2006, well before the licence application in 2008. In terms of claiming "the club has done what it said it would do up to now", unless it adds 3500 capacity before February, no it hasn't: "Super League side Hull KR have announced ambitious plans to expand their Craven Park stadium as part of their licence application. And in order to support their application, Rovers have outlined plans to increase their current stadium capacity to more than 14,000 by 2010." www.inthenews.co.uk/news/sport/r ... 216392.htm Well done on the toilets and the new bar carpet though.

Quote: rover49 "Since we applied The pitch was substantially improved in 2006, well before the licence application in 2008. In terms of claiming "the club has done what it said it would do up to now", unless it adds 3500 capacity before February, no it hasn't: "Super League side Hull KR have announced ambitious plans to expand their Craven Park stadium as part of their licence application. And in order to support their application, Rovers have outlined plans to increase their current stadium capacity to more than 14,000 by 2010." www.inthenews.co.uk/news/sport/r ... 216392.htm Well done on the toilets and the new bar carpet though.

\

enjoyed watching some of that game.

its good to see the salary cap doing its job.

the rise of huddersfield is a further example of what i referred to.

leeds have had some good times but now are beginning the slide that happens to top teams in the nrl.

if you are a real fan, you will support them through good times and bad

you see this is better dally, good work, using wigan and hudds as your examples, two clubs who have spent a fair bit of money from their respective owners as evidence, very contradictory, i like it,

thats a little more cerebral, but your delivery was lazy and obvious, better work, but you still have a long way to go

hull kr would have been a better example, you would have got more bites you see, and it wouldnt have been as obvious

using two fairly free spending clubs, propped up by their owners as examples of the sc working was too obvious

had you used a traditionally small club, which has acheived on the back of imports it would have been a little more disguised, because you have changed the argument from 'SC works here are two poor examples of clubs only able to suceed under the SC' to 'the SC works here is a good example of a club only able to suceed under an SC, but one which has needed to rely on imports, something we dont want'