some decisions go for you, some go against you, they even up over time, Bradford were admittedly the better side but at the final hooter Leeds were in front end of, debating the rights and wrongs of officials decisions is pointless, Leeds were beaten in the 2005 GF by a side who cheated (using Moz) and last years WCC when Melbourne massively burst the salary cap, then we had the Tansey try at MM which was an injustice to Bradford but,
some decisions go for you, some go against you.

Moz was a LOAN player from NRL so was not cheating, We followed the loan rules -_-. Melbourne hadn't been found out. Though after the WCC should have been void. Tansey was way offside. This game was a farce at the end, mixture of bad calls (never mind 50/50) and crap defence. Also I think 5 penalty tries in the whole of SL, 2 were for Leeds against Bradford. Bulls have also had most Video Refs decisionms denied with over 60% being Silverwood/Ganson/Klien.... Coincidence? I think not. Officials have never liked us since Northern walked off the pitch against Hull KR.

we breached the cap in 2005 when we won SL.

Sssssssssssshhhhhhh. Don't tell everyone!

Like I said, last sunday Bulls were the better side but the scoreboard didn't say that, also admittedly the Tansey try was a disgrace AND so was playimg Moz in 2005 GF. Say you were the Bulls player who played most of the season only to lose your GF place to Moz, you,d be happy about that would you? That Bull who lost his shirt to Moz was cheated as was the game in general, Moz didn't get paid then? yeah right!!

If a team beat the Bulls in a major final and 'loaned' Billy Slater or Greg Inglis or Benji Marshall then that would be fine would it? I think not.

Like I said blaming refs is pointless and futile, it evens itself up in the end. Bradford were not cheated, they just didn't get the rub this time.

pop quiz time, who was the bull who missed out when Morley was signed?

andy lynch. experience doesnt seem to have affected him too badly since

The best thing is he probably genuinely believes this!!


Dude, you're giving Bulls fans a seriously bad name. You played really well, had a lot of good points, looked clinical at times, and a decent defence. You only lost by 2 points to a team that were huge favourites and have won the league 4 times in the past 7 years, given that you finished 10th last year I'd suggest perhaps that might be a result that you'd have taken given the opportunity going into the match?! Your new coaching setup and players will take time to gel, but for your first proper match together you had the signs of a real force of the competition and only narrowly lost to, like I said, pretty much exactly the same team that's won the competition 4 times in the last 7 years (without breaking the cap!!).

And what do you do.... "Booo hoooo, all the refs have got it in for us.... booo hoooo". Seriously fella... grow up.

Just like Tansey doing 50m in a second then. CHEATS

Well said Mick Gledhill!

If you READ my post at the top of this page you will see I said giving the Tansey 'try' was a disgrace!!

In that game Leeds didn't cheat you, the video ref did.

In the case of 'loaning' Moz for the 2005 GF the Bradford club cheated, if you believe Moz played for nothing thats your choice, in that year Bradford broke the cap, FACT and therefore CHEATED.
There is a big difference.