Probably did get paid, did we get points deducted in 2005?

Still niggles does it Michael?

So your saying to me that Tansey didn't know what he was doing when by the time Sinfield put boot to ball, he was already over the Bradford 20m line.

the live cap wasn't in place by then. 2006 was the year we copped the 2 points deduction.

Peter Hood maintained that it wasn't the signing of Morley that took us over the cap.

I suspect he was responding to Gledhill's latest attack of the vapours, and in any case, didn't Redhall take a dim view of your Bradford Ways and deduct you a couple of points?

We have a winner

Being in fornt of the kicker at a penalty is usually a penalty to the opposition. Having 2 points deducted seems rather harsh.

Klein should have had 2 plums deducted

It is. But being rewarded with 2 of your opposition's competition points is also harsh on them.

we "cheated" in 2005 by breaching the salary cap, not by playing Morley. If you can prove that signing Morley put us over the salary cap then you're a better accountant that the one the bulls used in 2005.

As mentioned previously, he also took Lynch's place in the squad that played in the final. Where is Rob Parker compared to Lynch nowadays? I know which player I would rather have too. Are you really trying to tell us that if Leeds were to sign a better player than someone currently in the squad and it meant the Leeds player had to lose his playing registration to complete the new signing you wouldn't condone it?

He can't prove it, because it's impossible. I know exactly what put us over the cap that year and it wasn't the loan signing of Morley. But then, that doesn't suit his argument. Much like how all other cheating is ignored because it doesn't suit the argument.