Not true

It is 100% true Gaskell would only sign if he got first chance at six we told him he be first chance full back for us but he wanted to play 6

I agree about Sammut - brilliant sometimes and on other occasions it doesn't come off, and that can be in the same game, but that is what you get when players play off the cuff and I'd guess most fans like that, even if it probably gives the coach ulcers. No idea about his personality though or what he's like to work with so can't really comment. Though I do know I hope he is around next year, and if it is the case that Danny Addy is going to play more in the pack we need the extra half back to keep the pressure up. Either way round, silly money from the good doctor would suit our finances I guess - but it would have to be silly money...

He may blow hot and cold, but for the matches he's won from his flashes of brilliance he deserves to be starting.

I think Gaskell is a good signing, but he hasn't proven anything yet, and if I were Jarrod I wouldn't be happy being a bench player.

He's a professional. If he feels he deserves to start but the coach puts him on the bench then the ball is in his court, so show the coach he's wrong..

Suspect heritage has true story of what was said to players given he works at bulls.

Gaskell may have been told he would get an opportunity at 6, form and injuries permitting, but telling a kid who hasn't played 6 all season he'd be first choice in front of our best back, 5 months before the season even starts sounds ridiculous.

As we've seen with a few players this season, if Sammut doesn't want to stay then he should hand in a transfer request. Simple as that.

Indeed. I have the feeling it sounds ridiculous mainly because it is.

FC wants competition for places. No player has been told he's first choice.