Quote: Bulls4Champs "I think it's clear as day that the U20's are vastly understrength given that they are about 9 eligible players down. However, they really shouldn't be 11 games in and 11 games lost.'"
It is easy to make this criticism based on the numbers. Adey mentioned that Stuart Barrow/Paul Medley have come in for criticism, I suppose its because people are looking at it in the same way as you.
As I said, it is not only the effect of the number of injured core 20s squad players, but the lack of the first team squad players playing in the 20s that have resulted in this year's league position.
This has meant that the places have been filled in with 17/18 year olds. In the last but one 20s game v Leeds there were 7 of them, and no first team squad members - Callum Windley being promoted after that.
The other teams ALWAYS have first team squad / first team experienced players in.
It makes a massive difference at this age. In this era of forward domination, the everlasting adage that a prop hasnt matured until he is 27 is still the case. His body generally hasnt developed adequately to meet the stresses on it until he is past 22. You cant expect boys to win against men.
Someone may still comment that it is the same for everybody, but Bulls have lost every game. I guess this then can then only be down to how many players are carried in each squad at every level, such that injuries are not affecting the teams with bigger squads as much in the results. It is obvious that Bulls dont have the luxury to have big squads at every level.
So, whilst the first teams results are positive, and the 18s are on a roll, and RL is all about confidence and momentum, that is why I said dont dilute the 18s by bringing them into 20s unless it is for their individual personal development. In the current circumstances, let the 20s result be what it will be, and watch for the improvement in the near future when the 18s come through.
And importantly, give the current 20s the positive support of true fans.
