Or BK at stand off with Sykes/Platt at full back.

Another effing b**t*rding k*o**ing injury. It beggers belief it really does.

He's okay at stand off as long as he has an organiser alongside him (which he won't), however by playing BK at six you instantly weaken the full back position with Sykes and Platt the only alternatives with Kear missing.

I'd go with Addy due to his kicking game and if Potter does go with Sykes then hopefully he at least plays Addy at 13. Sykes at stand off and Langley at loose forward will leave the team severely lacking in ball players and I can't see ourselves getting much joy from an Hull defence which has been good so far this season.

Didn't Addy play at Scrum Half a couple of times last season and was man of the match playing there? could have been from the bench, or am i mistaken...?

On a brighter note re the injuries, Elima will be back and hopefully Purtell which should strengthen us defensively in the forwards and the backs.

Is this true? given todays news, are you running at full cap or just dont have the funds to extend what you have spent? If you are at full cap then the upper management need shooting if they cannot attract the players you have for a lot less than you are paying!! No offence intended, my team have spent big on salary (Hull KR) for a good number of years but we needed to in order to try and attract said players. Bradford is a big name, you spending the full cap and having (again no offence) not the greatest team, is poor management.

Or the inability to take advantage financially of the myriad ways of getting round the cap?