Am i correct in saying it was Potter's decision to let Menzies go? if so that would be point 5 in the errors list....

Potter also sanctioned giving a three year contract to Paul Sykes

Was confirmed by Peter Hood at the Fans Forum.

So if it turns out that we can't offload him, as has been widely assumed, then we'll be stuck with him - and it will be Potter's fault

Was this the word you meant or did spellchecker change it.

Meh.

I think the Sykes signing has something to do with the need for home grown players and he's able to play in a few positions (to what standard is open to debate). I didn't think he played particularly well last night but, then again, who did?

Briggs seemed to be a bit off the pace and I think sending him to London was good move in principle, especially if he was guaranteed game time. One for the future and maybe with Herbert injured and our season over he'll get to play the last few games.

Herbert... we needed a half. I think it's as simple as that. We were all crying out for a specialist rather than playing someone out of position and unfortunately there were few, if any, available.

Royston - agree to a certain extent. I think he and BK had the start of a decent partnership going when they were interchanging between FB and SO (though I may be the only one who does!) I'm also not 100% convinced that BK is a better FB - to be fair we never really saw Royston play their for any length of time so it's hard to compare.

Motivation - like I said. Meh.

no that is the word i meant to say!