Quote: Peregrine " So to simplify things for us all can't we say that we are allowed 5 Non Fed trained players regardless of whether they are also on the overseas quota as well. Effectively we are allowed 5 players who have not come through a Super League team's academy (barring exemptions such as Jefries & Royston)'"
thats not a bad way of looking at it. Theres two excpetions to that rule though.
first there's australian/new zealand born players who come over here young enough to be classed as uk fed trained (think harrison hansen, maybe robbie paul? etc). These are pretty rare.
secondly theres all the australian/new zealand born players who were playing in SL when the non-fed trained rules were brought in (feb 2008 from memory). These players were all granted exemptions to the non fed status and are classed as fed trained as long as they stay in superleague. This covers players like glenn morrison, ali lauititi etc. This category of player is pretty common at the moment but should reduce as players retire. Once their all gone then your way of explaining the quota will pretty much be accurate.
The source of all the confusion is that when the RFL changed the quota rules to include the non-fed trained status they said that clubs were allowed 5 Overseas quota players and 5 non-fed trained quota players. What they didnt make clear was that players could count on both quotas simultaneously. Hence people tend to think that clubs are allowed 5 Overseas AND 5 non fed players.
The confusion should settle down in 2 or 3 years as most of the players granted exemptions should have retired by then. The extra exemptions granted to crusaders players should extend this much as they only count for their first contract signed after leaving crusaders. So unless someone givesa crusaders quota player a very long contract they should be out of system around same time.
Typical confusing mess we've come to expect from RFL really.