Platt, Sheriffe, Jeffries, Newton and Solomona I definatley agree are dead wood. Platt and Sheriffe would be more suited to the lower leagues. Jeffries is a border line super league standard player and Newton and Solomona are past it eack by a few years.

However I disagree with your choices on Langley and Godwin. Langley's work rate is phenominal and matched by very few in our side, he's got unbelieveable fitness and can carry on working for 80 minutes. Personally, I think he is being used incorrectly. He shouldn't be played down the middle like he has been asked to recently. The edges are where he is best. I think Godwin still has something to offer though, unlike Newton, Godwin can play 80 minutes and he has some quickness around the ruck area, sure his passing isn't spectacular and he isn't a monster in defence, but he's a hard little worker and on performances this and last season I would be selecting him in front of Terry Newton.

I don't think many would describe Jeffries as a playmaker. His game is based on support play & utilising his speed. There are no real creative players if Newton is not peforming around the ruck.

yet there was no evidence of this on Friday. He needs to buck his ideas up.

As I've agreed elsewhere. My ongoing frustration is why this requirement always seems to be reserved for only one of the HBs.

Aye, Deacon should be doing this as well.

Originally when we signed Jeffries i thought great, bit of extra speed and an addition to our in-game kicking. I think, gradually Jeffries has got slower and sometimes his kicking can be appalling.