Quote Saddened!="Saddened!"I think personally the lack of quality in Super League is 100% down to the coaches and players. The intensity just isn't there. That is the big difference between SL and the NRL, the intensity over there is just leagues ahead of SL. You occassionally see a big game get up to that level over here, but they are few and far between. The clubs have to see that they are coasting and aim up, for the benefit of the product if nothing else. They have to realise it's about entertaining the fans, otherwise the money will dry up. '"
The slide in entertainment value for me coincided with the relaxing of the rules demanding tacklers get off the tackled player immediately. There's too much latitude allowed for wrestling on the floor, giving defensive lines too much time to regroup. As well as this, refs stopped taking defences back as far.
The result is that defences (especially the better teams') are too much on top. Attacking play as also become far more structured and, in most cases (including Saints) generally one-dimensional. I find games to be too much of an attritional biff-a-thon, with big blokes running at other big blokes. There's a lack of craft, a lack of
As an entertainment spectacle, I think the sport has gone several steps backwards
At Saints, we've suffered more than most, because our best periods of success have been built on the back of off-the-cuff rugby, catching defences cold & disorganised, using two of the greatest hookers of the modern to exploit this. The changes in the rules (or, at least, the interpretation of the rules) happened to coincide with the general decline in the quality of our team. Then we've got the issue of Langtree Park being rather soulless.
Overall, I've lost a huge amount of interest in both the game in general and Saints in particular.